2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Approaches, Methods and Models Used to Assess Abstraction Limits for Unconfined Aquifers in France

Abstract: This chapter presents a review of methods an tools used in France to assess groundwater abstraction limits in unconfined aquifers. The experience gained from over 30 studies shows that the estimation of Maximum Permissible Volume (MPV) is complicated by numerous uncertainties. The first prerequisite is a good knowledge of the dynamics of the hydrosystems and abstraction volumes, but unfortunately this is rarely achieved. Moreover, both the calculation methods and modelling tools that aim to conceptualize these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-identify variations in groundwater quantity status, highlighting groundwater response to climate variability [7]; -study linkages between groundwater level variations (for all variability timescales) and large-scale atmospheric circulation [26]; -describe hydrosystems by comparing piezometric data with rainfall and river discharge data [16,31]; -assess groundwater abstraction limits in unconfined aquifers [2]; and -build simplified hydrodynamic models such as largescale groundwater-river exchange models as has been done in France [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-identify variations in groundwater quantity status, highlighting groundwater response to climate variability [7]; -study linkages between groundwater level variations (for all variability timescales) and large-scale atmospheric circulation [26]; -describe hydrosystems by comparing piezometric data with rainfall and river discharge data [16,31]; -assess groundwater abstraction limits in unconfined aquifers [2]; and -build simplified hydrodynamic models such as largescale groundwater-river exchange models as has been done in France [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also the risk of “regulatory capture” which is a situation where the relationship between the regulator and the regulated is too close and threatens the environmental effectiveness and the fairness of negotiated outcomes (Lopez‐Gunn & Cortina, 2006). In France, the setting of volumetric extraction caps is an outcome of a participative process, which has so far resulted in generous user allocations at the expense of meeting environmental requirements (Arnaud, 2020; Rouillard & Rinaudo, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodologies for assessing the SEL vary greatly, ranging from simple statistical analysis to sophisticated integrated surface-groundwater models. Reporting on an analysis of a sample of those studies, Arnaud (2020) warns that the setting of SELs in France is not always scientifically robust and that SELs have sometimes been overestimated due to various reasons, from insufficient knowledge to political pressure from water users. However, he shows that SELs have often been 10 to 20% below current water use levels, and up to 50% in some cases, posing major challenges to authorities charged with reducing allocations to water users.…”
Section: Defining the Allocable Resource Poolmentioning
confidence: 99%