2015
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-3-w2-273-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concept for a Compound Analysis in Active Learning for Remote Sensing

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Active learning reduces training costs for supervised classification by acquiring ground truth data only for the most useful samples. We present a new concept for the analysis of active learning techniques. Our framework is split into an outer and an inner view to facilitate the assignment of different influences. The main contribution of this paper is a concept of a new compound analysis in the active learning loop. It comprises three sub-analyses: structural, oracle, prediction. They are combined to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly a concern for regional-scale HR datasets. While certain innovative methods such as active learning have been proposed to reduce sampling costs [21,22], these methods are complex to implement and are beyond the scope of this study. An alternative is localizing sample selection to a single subset area of the region of interest.…”
Section: Background On Sample Selection In Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly a concern for regional-scale HR datasets. While certain innovative methods such as active learning have been proposed to reduce sampling costs [21,22], these methods are complex to implement and are beyond the scope of this study. An alternative is localizing sample selection to a single subset area of the region of interest.…”
Section: Background On Sample Selection In Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection and training process is done iteratively. Wuttke et al (2015) present a method, how the usefulness for each unlabeled training sample can be rated. They create a hypothesis based on analyses of the following three components.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%