2015
DOI: 10.21726/abc.v2i1.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comunidade de abelhas (Hymenoptera, Apidae) e plantas associadas em área de mata atlântica em São Francisco do Sul, Santa Catarina, Brasil

Abstract: A comunidade de abelhas nativas em uma área de mata atlântica no sul do Brasil foi estudada no período 2001-2003, utilizando-se rede entomológica em plantas floridas. Foram amostrados 1.519 indivíduos de 80 espécies e 4 subfamílias de abelhas. Houve predomínio de espécies de Apinae não corbiculadas e Halictinae e de indivíduos de Apinae corbiculados e Halictinae. As plantas associadas totalizaram 124 espécies de 46 famílias, das quais as mais visitadas foram Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae e Melastomataceae. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
11
1
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
11
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The Apidae family presented the highest abundance in this study. This was expected, as commonly documented in apicultural surveys in different regions and/or ecosystems of the Brazilian territory, such as dunes (Oliveira et al, 2010;Gostinski et al, 2016), restinga (Madeira-da-Silva & Martins 2003Kamke et al, 2011), Caatinga (Lopes et al, 2010), the Amazon (Albuquerque et al, 2001), and Atlantic Forest (Mouga et al, 2015, Somavilla et al, 2018.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The Apidae family presented the highest abundance in this study. This was expected, as commonly documented in apicultural surveys in different regions and/or ecosystems of the Brazilian territory, such as dunes (Oliveira et al, 2010;Gostinski et al, 2016), restinga (Madeira-da-Silva & Martins 2003Kamke et al, 2011), Caatinga (Lopes et al, 2010), the Amazon (Albuquerque et al, 2001), and Atlantic Forest (Mouga et al, 2015, Somavilla et al, 2018.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For the other species of bees identified as specialists, there are no published studies on their mutualistic interactions patterns, demonstrating the important knowledge gap. Available data are limited to the degree of rarity, record and frequency of occurrence (Schlindwein, 1998;Imperatriz-Fonseca et al, 2011;Boff et al, 2013;Mouga et al, 2015;Gostinski et al, 2016). It is also noteworthy that most of the specialist species emphasized here exhibit non-eusocial behavior, for which there are little data available in the literature and/or an expressive taxonomic impediment, especially for species in the Halictidae family (16 out of the 34 specialist species belong to this family).…”
Section: Specialist Bees In the Interaction Networkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Overall, there was a trend of both plant and bee species to take generalist roles with the reduction of the forest cover. For instance, the most generalist bees in networks were small and short-tongued, recognized as generalists in the use of their environments and floral resources (Michener 2007;Castro 2002;Mouga et al 2015). In the studied landscapes, bee species tended to vary their behavior, playing a more specialist role and visiting one or two plant species in landscapes with more forest, but acting as a generalist visiting more plant species in landscapes with less forest (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%