2010
DOI: 10.1097/meg.0b013e32833a5d63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Magnified virtual chromoendoscopy is as accurate as indigo carmine magnified chromoendoscopy in distinguishing between neoplastic from non-neoplastic small colorectal lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FICE is an image-processing technology, which generates real-time spectral images from conventional white light images (WLIs) by using special processing algorithms. It has been reported that FICE was superior to WLIs and equivalent to chromoendoscopy for diagnosing colorectal tumors [22,23], and that CE with FICE improves visibility of small-bowel lesions [24,25]. FICE may also improve the visibility of colorectal lesions with disrupted vessel patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FICE is an image-processing technology, which generates real-time spectral images from conventional white light images (WLIs) by using special processing algorithms. It has been reported that FICE was superior to WLIs and equivalent to chromoendoscopy for diagnosing colorectal tumors [22,23], and that CE with FICE improves visibility of small-bowel lesions [24,25]. FICE may also improve the visibility of colorectal lesions with disrupted vessel patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FICE can display color images with RGB components that have been assigned selected spectra in real time. Similarly, FICE magnification can enhance vascular and surface patterns and distinguish neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions [6,7,[15][16][17][18]. However, magnifying endoscopy is less prevalent in the USA, Europe, and Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recent studies have reported an agreement of 96.8% for lesions up to 2.0 cm and 94.9% for lesions up to 1.0 cm in diameter (9,41) . In the present study, out of 172 lesions undergoing EMR, 167 were neoplasms, showing an accuracy of 97.1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%