1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00169661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerised tomography in the management of imperforate anus patients following rectoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a prior anatomical study, IAS has been regarded as a missing or hypoplastic structure in patients with high and intermediate ARMs Therefore, little attention has been paid to the preservation of this structure [10]. However, studies on histology [6,[11][12][13][14], manometry [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], electromyography [14], anal endosonography [19,[21][22][23][24][25][26], magnetic resonance imaging [26,27], and computed tomography [27][28][29] have shown that IAS in ARMs is situated in the region of the fistulous bowel termination and the ectopic anus. It has been reported that RAIR presented in the low, intermediate, and high ARMs postoperatively in the manometric findings [11,18,[30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prior anatomical study, IAS has been regarded as a missing or hypoplastic structure in patients with high and intermediate ARMs Therefore, little attention has been paid to the preservation of this structure [10]. However, studies on histology [6,[11][12][13][14], manometry [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], electromyography [14], anal endosonography [19,[21][22][23][24][25][26], magnetic resonance imaging [26,27], and computed tomography [27][28][29] have shown that IAS in ARMs is situated in the region of the fistulous bowel termination and the ectopic anus. It has been reported that RAIR presented in the low, intermediate, and high ARMs postoperatively in the manometric findings [11,18,[30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a report of CT scanning, following rectoplasty, in 18 patients with ARM, Ong et al . [ 10 ] stated that sufficient criteria of “normal” development of the SMC were not available and graded SMC development simply as “adequate” or “deficient.” In our study, we had subjectively classified the SMC as “well developed” or “moderately developed.” In our study, only two boys, one with a RVeF and another with CPC, had a “moderately developed” SMC. All seven patients with a RPF had a “well-developed” AD and SMC, and this is somewhat surprising as this subtype of ARM is often associated with a poorer development of the perineum and the sphincteric musculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%