2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer vision-based concrete crack detection using U-net fully convolutional networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
239
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 565 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
239
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we selected the best learning rate through training and testing. Then we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed U-CliqueNet on the tunnel crack datasets that we set up and compared with these most recent algorithms: FCN [23] proposed by Yang et al, U-net [25] proposed by Liu et al, Bang's SegNet [38] and the MFCD [14] proposed by Li et al In addition, skeleton extraction was carried out for the predicted binary image, next the area, length and width of the crack are calculated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we selected the best learning rate through training and testing. Then we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed U-CliqueNet on the tunnel crack datasets that we set up and compared with these most recent algorithms: FCN [23] proposed by Yang et al, U-net [25] proposed by Liu et al, Bang's SegNet [38] and the MFCD [14] proposed by Li et al In addition, skeleton extraction was carried out for the predicted binary image, next the area, length and width of the crack are calculated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above three evaluation indicators, there are also three general indicators in crack detection, precision, recall and F1-score [19,25,37]. The precision represents the proportion of actual crack pixels in the predicted crack pixels, and the recall represents the proportion of correctly predicted crack pixels in the real crack pixels.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve existing approaches, other characteristics, such as the direction or shape of the cracks, should be considered in a smarter machine learning approach. More recently Deep Learning-based algorithms using convolutional neural networks have been introduced in this domain, which demonstrated promising results [5][6][7][8]. However, the examples of demonstration and implementation of these methods regarding the entire structure in large scale (not for a local detection problem) have been limited.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the developed methods for crack detection, edge-detection algorithms (Abdel-Qader et al, 2003), mathematical morphology (Sinha, Fieguth, 2006), high-speed percolation (Yamaguchi, Hashimoto, 2010), Principal Component Analysis (PCA) (Abdel-Qader et al, 2006), Extreme Learning Machine (Zhang et al, 2014) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Nashat et al, 2014) have been adopted. Furthermore, to improve the performances of image-based techniques and develop a method able to cover unexpected real-world situations, deep learning approaches (CNN -Convolutional Neural Network) have been also recently investigated (Li et al, 2018, Cha et al, 2017, Gopalakrishnan et al, 2017, Zou et al, 2018, Liu et al, 2019, Ren et al, 2020. Indeed, CNNs represent very powerful techniques for automatic feature extraction and classification problem and they have received considerable attention in the field of infrastructure monitoring thanks also to the spread of drones and other mobile mapping systems which can acquire a large amount of data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last approach provides pixel-level classification by detecting all the pixels which belong to the crack. It represents, therefore, the most accurate method for this specific task (Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%