2014
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s46483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational prognostic indicators for breast cancer

Abstract: Breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Comprehensive genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics studies are emerging that offer an opportunity to model disease biology, prognosis, and response to specific therapies. Although many biomarkers have been identified through advances in data mining techniques, few have been applied broadly to make patient-specific decisions. Here, we review a selection of breast cancer prognostic indicators and their implications. Our goal is to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An obvious weakness is that a microarray represents a single snapshot of the patient. [15] But there are a large number of elements leading to disturbed gene function [16], such as large and small deletions or single base substitutions, mutations that affect promoter regions or splice-sites, as well as epigenetic silencing. Those factors may influence the result but may go undetected as well, depending on the exact type of lesion as well as its location with respect to the area hybridizing with the probe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An obvious weakness is that a microarray represents a single snapshot of the patient. [15] But there are a large number of elements leading to disturbed gene function [16], such as large and small deletions or single base substitutions, mutations that affect promoter regions or splice-sites, as well as epigenetic silencing. Those factors may influence the result but may go undetected as well, depending on the exact type of lesion as well as its location with respect to the area hybridizing with the probe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of NB cell lines with Ronicinib, led to downregulation of c-Myc, cell cycle arrest, and eventually cell apoptosis. Similar analyses by the same group in breast cancer models identified markers of metastasis as well as patient prognostic indicators (Yang, et al, 2014, Yang, et al, 2013). While this approach does not identify distinct markers of NB CSCs, per say, it can help us better understand the gene networks associated with aggressive cell subpopulations and identify potential CSC targets for the treatment of high-risk disease.…”
Section: Advancing Technology For Identification and Characterizatmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Yang et al [19] highlight some of the challenges associated with developing prognostic indicators for breast cancer. Integration of information such as gene deletions, translocations, and locus amplification; biomarkers from high-throughput -omics technologies such as genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics; and long recognized outcome variables such as tumor size, histologic grade, axillary nodal status, and estrogen receptor (ER) status [19] can be used to provide a more tailored therapy. One of the key challenges is the integration of -omics data to provide a robust and effective solution.…”
Section: Challenges In Biomarker Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%