2022
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10010149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Prediction of Bacteriophage Host Ranges

Abstract: Increased antibiotic resistance has prompted the development of bacteriophage agents for a multitude of applications in agriculture, biotechnology, and medicine. A key factor in the choice of agents for these applications is the host range of a bacteriophage, i.e., the bacterial genera, species, and strains a bacteriophage is able to infect. Although experimental explorations of host ranges remain the gold standard, such investigations are inherently limited to a small number of viruses and bacteria amendable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gap is slowly filled with new laboratory methods of high-throughput identification of virus-host interactions (including proximity ligation, viral tagging, phageFISH, and XRM-Seq) but these methods still require a careful interpretation by an expert and thus the paste of the discovery lags the deluge of metagenomic data ( Coclet and Roux, 2021 ; Smith et al, 2022 ). These issues have prompted the development of bioinformatics tools that predict the potential host(s) based on the virus genome sequence and may select candidates for experimental verification of the interaction ( Versoza and Pfeifer, 2022 ). Some of the most promising approaches to phage-host predictions are based on machine learning (ML) algorithms ( Wang et al, 2020 ; Coutinho et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This gap is slowly filled with new laboratory methods of high-throughput identification of virus-host interactions (including proximity ligation, viral tagging, phageFISH, and XRM-Seq) but these methods still require a careful interpretation by an expert and thus the paste of the discovery lags the deluge of metagenomic data ( Coclet and Roux, 2021 ; Smith et al, 2022 ). These issues have prompted the development of bioinformatics tools that predict the potential host(s) based on the virus genome sequence and may select candidates for experimental verification of the interaction ( Versoza and Pfeifer, 2022 ). Some of the most promising approaches to phage-host predictions are based on machine learning (ML) algorithms ( Wang et al, 2020 ; Coutinho et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most promising approaches to phage-host predictions are based on machine learning (ML) algorithms ( Wang et al, 2020 ; Coutinho et al, 2021 ). As has been recently highlighted ( Coclet and Roux, 2021 ; Versoza and Pfeifer, 2022 ), there is a pressing need to establish robust, comprehensive, and balanced sets suitable for training and testing ML algorithms. PHD can aid developers in constructing custom sets meeting specific criteria such as taxonomic affiliations of viruses and hosts, quality of the genome assemblies, and source databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the best practices suggested by Versoza and Pfeifer (2022) , both exploratory and confirmatory methods were used to computationally predict host ranges for 40 closely related cluster P mycobacteriophages ( Supplementary Table 1 ). First, the exploratory tool PHERI v.0.2 ( Baláž et al 2020 ) was used to predict bacterial host genera.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some tools available online to identify these features, such as VirHostMatcher, which identifies host range based on oligonucleotide frequency in a k-mer length [ 103 ]. Lastly, the advancement of high-throughput sequencing technology allows prediction of host range based on sequence features, CpG bias, and CG bias through machine learning algorithms [ 104 , 105 ].…”
Section: Engineering Strategies Of Phage Tail Fiber For Reprogramming...mentioning
confidence: 99%