1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0303-2647(96)01660-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational parallels between the biological olfactory pathway and its analogue `The Electronic Nose': Part II. Sensor-based machine olfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Table II provides a few representative publications of these pattern classification methods in e-nose applications. Additional references can be found in [66], [67].…”
Section: E Comparison Between Quadratic Knn Mlp and Rbf Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Table II provides a few representative publications of these pattern classification methods in e-nose applications. Additional references can be found in [66], [67].…”
Section: E Comparison Between Quadratic Knn Mlp and Rbf Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sensory domain, the sensors detect electrical changes due to the odorant molecules [SG92]. It is possible to integrate the sensors on to the actual CMOS chip [Pea97]. Although the idea is relatively straightforward (altering the electrical properties of an insulating (polymer) layer as a result of the arrival of air-borne molecules), there are difficulties both in delivery, and, because of the chemical nature of the sensing, due to issues of drift and poisoning.…”
Section: Other Sensory Neuromorphic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalization has been previously employed in gas discrimination applications where the identification must be based on signature pattern, and not on the concentration dependent amplitudes [8]- [10]. On one hand, normalization is useful to set the range of values for sensors' output to range in order to avoid the data pattern with larger signal magnitude to dominate in the data space.…”
Section: B Experimental Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%