Neuroergonomics 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811926-6.00019-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Models for Near-Real-Time Performance Predictions Based on Physiological Measures of Workload

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of several physiological sensors to classify workload states gives better results than using a single one. The approach proposed in [25] combines EEG, ECG, and electrooculography (EOG); and results show the best predictive power for their combination (80%) rather than the analysis of each one independently (70%). In addition, the study in [10] reports an accuracy average of 85.2 (±4.3%) combining EEG, ECG, respiration rate, and EDA to classify four mental states.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of several physiological sensors to classify workload states gives better results than using a single one. The approach proposed in [25] combines EEG, ECG, and electrooculography (EOG); and results show the best predictive power for their combination (80%) rather than the analysis of each one independently (70%). In addition, the study in [10] reports an accuracy average of 85.2 (±4.3%) combining EEG, ECG, respiration rate, and EDA to classify four mental states.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of several physiological sensors to classify workload states gives better results than using a single one. The approach proposed in [24] combines EEG, ECG, and electrooculography (EOG) and results show a highest predictive power for their combination (80%) rather than the analysis of each one independently (70%). Besides, the study in [12] reports an accuracy average of 85.2 (± 4.3%) combining EEG, ECG, respiration rate, and EDA to classify 4 mental states.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning can effectively learn unique features that capture inherent patterns in the data and construct predictive models [14]. For instance, a proposed method integrates ECG, EEG, and electrooculography (EOG), demonstrating superior predictive capability compared to individual analyses [15]. Similarly, another research showcases high accuracy by combining ECG, EEG, and respiration rate for the classification of mental conditions [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%