2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-012-0820-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational localization of transcription factor binding sites using extreme learning machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Random forests have been used to predict p300 binding sites from histone modifications in human embryonic stem cells and lung fibroblasts [56] . Machine-learning algorithms have also been applied to the related problem of selecting functional TF binding sites out of the thousands of hits to a TF's binding motif throughout the genome [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] . Finally, two groups have taken a less supervised approach and used hidden Markov models (ChromHMM) [64] and dynamic Bayesian networks (Segway) [65] to segment the human genome into regions with unique signatures in ENCODE data and then assigned potential functions, such as enhancer activity, to these states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random forests have been used to predict p300 binding sites from histone modifications in human embryonic stem cells and lung fibroblasts [56] . Machine-learning algorithms have also been applied to the related problem of selecting functional TF binding sites out of the thousands of hits to a TF's binding motif throughout the genome [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] . Finally, two groups have taken a less supervised approach and used hidden Markov models (ChromHMM) [64] and dynamic Bayesian networks (Segway) [65] to segment the human genome into regions with unique signatures in ENCODE data and then assigned potential functions, such as enhancer activity, to these states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%