2017
DOI: 10.1042/etls20160025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational biology: deep learning

Abstract: Deep learning is the trendiest tool in a computational biologist's toolbox. This exciting class of methods, based on artificial neural networks, quickly became popular due to its competitive performance in prediction problems. In pioneering early work, applying simple network architectures to abundant data already provided gains over traditional counterparts in functional genomics, image analysis, and medical diagnostics. Now, ideas for constructing and training networks and even off-the-shelf models have been… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings confirm the utility of ensemble methods, and in particular boosting models, for predicting antibiotic resistance. While deep learning models are able to capture higher order interactions between features, and therefore often outperform simpler alternatives [37], they did not provide additional advantage here. Tree-based methods are often used as an intermediate between simple models that treat features independently, like logistic regression, and more complex, but poorly interpretable models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings confirm the utility of ensemble methods, and in particular boosting models, for predicting antibiotic resistance. While deep learning models are able to capture higher order interactions between features, and therefore often outperform simpler alternatives [37], they did not provide additional advantage here. Tree-based methods are often used as an intermediate between simple models that treat features independently, like logistic regression, and more complex, but poorly interpretable models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a complicated task even for humans, and as classical computational approaches have not been sufficiently accurate, fluorescent staining with its clean nuclear signal has been preferred. However, recent breakthroughs in deep learning have led to impressive performance on image analysis tasks in general (Angermueller et al 2016;Fan and Zhou 2016) , and segmentation from cell images in particular (Van Valen et al 2016;Falk et al 2019;Christiansen et al 2018;Jones et al 2017) . This motivates a re-evaluation of whether nuclear segmentation could be achieved without a DNA stain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter, deep learning models are attractive to computational biologists, mainly due to the ability to learn a robust representation directly from raw input data, including bases of DNA sequences or pixel intensities of a microscopy image. On the other hand, traditional machine learning methods require extensive laboratory work for feature extraction in order to develop a reliable model [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%