2009
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbp045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational approaches and software tools for genetic linkage map estimation in plants

Abstract: Genetic maps are an important component within the plant biologist's toolkit, underpinning crop plant improvement programs. The estimation of plant genetic maps is a conceptually simple yet computationally complex problem, growing ever more so with the development of inexpensive, high-throughput DNA markers. The challenge for bioinformaticians is to develop analytical methods and accompanying software tools that can cope with datasets of differing sizes, from tens to thousands of markers, that can incorporate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inverted segments were identified as two or more independent markers that exhibited reversed ordering between species; inverted segments at the terminal ends of LGs required the misordering of at least one terminal marker and two or more internal markers. Because establishing the correct map position of tightly linked markers in high-density linkage maps can be difficult due to duplicated loci, genotyping errors, segregation distortion, and chiasma interference (Hackett and Broadfoot 2003;Ferreira et al 2006;Cheema and Dicks 2009;Collard et al 2009), minor ordering errors can arise. As such, a 2-cM threshold was applied for declaring noncollinearity (Hudson et al 2011).…”
Section: Synteny Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverted segments were identified as two or more independent markers that exhibited reversed ordering between species; inverted segments at the terminal ends of LGs required the misordering of at least one terminal marker and two or more internal markers. Because establishing the correct map position of tightly linked markers in high-density linkage maps can be difficult due to duplicated loci, genotyping errors, segregation distortion, and chiasma interference (Hackett and Broadfoot 2003;Ferreira et al 2006;Cheema and Dicks 2009;Collard et al 2009), minor ordering errors can arise. As such, a 2-cM threshold was applied for declaring noncollinearity (Hudson et al 2011).…”
Section: Synteny Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double reduction occurs randomly in polysomic species and only introduces a small bias into recombination frequency estimates . This means that, ignoring the possible influence of double reduction, diploid mapping software can generally be used for simplex marker sets at any ploidy level and for any type of meiotic pairing behaviour (Figure 4), opening up a very wide range of diploid-specific software options (Cheema and Dicks, 2009 Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (4x)…”
Section: Linkage Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likelihood: For high-density data, map estimation is typically carried out on the basis of the two-point estimates of the recombination fractions (Cheema and Dicks 2009), primarily due to computational issues. Fundamentally, map uncertainty is due to the sampling error attached to these estimates, which will propagate through to the final map estimate.…”
Section: Asymptotic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches to genetic map estimation have been proposed and are reviewed along with common challenges in Cheema and Dicks (2009). Perhaps the most challenging step in map construction is ordering markers within a linkage group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%