2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-2663-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive strain rate dependence and constitutive modeling of closed-cell aluminum foams with various relative densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rather uniform level of plateau stress, with very slightly increasing slope, occurred around 23 MPa, and densification started around 35 MPa. A densification region and rapid rise of stress began at around 52% of sample deformation, thus indicating acceptable agreement between the energy absorption behavior and results reported in the literature [4,14,41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A rather uniform level of plateau stress, with very slightly increasing slope, occurred around 23 MPa, and densification started around 35 MPa. A densification region and rapid rise of stress began at around 52% of sample deformation, thus indicating acceptable agreement between the energy absorption behavior and results reported in the literature [4,14,41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Modeling was carried out under the limitation of a small strain (< 10%), thus densification strain was not achieved for the numerical sample. Modeling of the densification region would require a different simulation model, as shown by the authors of [14]. From Figure 11A,B, it can be observed that shear had a prominent role in the deformation of the sample, and was especially pronounced along the xy and yz planes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their work also showed that, in comparison to the static gas injection method, the dynamic gas injection method produced a significantly reduced foam cell size, which resulted in enhanced mechanical properties. In addition, a number of studies have been carried out to determine the mechanical behavior of regular cellular materials [25][26][27][28] and metallic foams [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] under dynamic load. Guo et al [29] investigated the dynamic behavior of an AFS plate under repeated impacts using drop hammer tests with various energy levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penetration behavior of the front and back faces was characterized, and the maximum energy absorption was measured after the rupture of the front face. Jing et al [37] studied the compressive mechanical properties of closed-cell aluminum foams under quasi-static and dynamic loading. A multi-parameter constitutive model was proposed to predict stress as a function of the foam relative density, strain, and strain rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%