2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/295428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive Background Modeling for Foreground Extraction

Abstract: Robust and efficient foreground extraction is a crucial topic in many computer vision applications. In this paper, we propose an accurate and computationally efficient background subtraction method. The key idea is to reduce the data dimensionality of image frame based on compressive sensing and in the meanwhile apply sparse representation to build the current background by a set of preceding background images. According to greedy iterative optimization, the background image and background subtracted image can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7, the qualitative and quantitative results for one test frame of each video sequence obtained by each method are represented in Table 1. We can observe that, for almost every test sequence, the generated binary image of our proposed approach is more precise than those obtained by the SDE [17], MDPS [18], ISBS [19] and CBMFE [27] methods. The proposed method attains the highest quantitative and qualitative values such as the accuracy rate is over 72% for Similarity measures and over than 82% F-measure values in the almost sequences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…7, the qualitative and quantitative results for one test frame of each video sequence obtained by each method are represented in Table 1. We can observe that, for almost every test sequence, the generated binary image of our proposed approach is more precise than those obtained by the SDE [17], MDPS [18], ISBS [19] and CBMFE [27] methods. The proposed method attains the highest quantitative and qualitative values such as the accuracy rate is over 72% for Similarity measures and over than 82% F-measure values in the almost sequences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Those sequences contain different types of objects such as vehicles, human bodies and others, moving or waiting in the scene. We compare our results with four other background subtraction methods: (1) SDE [17]; (2) MDPS [18]; (3) ISBS [19]; and (4) CBMFE [27]. We implement the four methods, using the default values of all the parameters given in each paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations