2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive refutation of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 344 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation was based on a detailed analysis of multiple climate proxies from a single ice core, GISP2 [20] (click on Supplementary Information Figure 76). However, this conclusion was disputed by Holliday et al [104], who claimed the YD onset occurred 30 years before the Pt peak. Holliday et al based that conclusion on comparing climate proxies from multiple ice cores using the multi-core GICC05 timescale, and they neglected to consider the GICC05 uncertainties of ± 140 years.…”
Section: Site Datingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interpretation was based on a detailed analysis of multiple climate proxies from a single ice core, GISP2 [20] (click on Supplementary Information Figure 76). However, this conclusion was disputed by Holliday et al [104], who claimed the YD onset occurred 30 years before the Pt peak. Holliday et al based that conclusion on comparing climate proxies from multiple ice cores using the multi-core GICC05 timescale, and they neglected to consider the GICC05 uncertainties of ± 140 years.…”
Section: Site Datingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ∼12.8 ka YDB layer at ∼50 broadly distributed sites has been extensively reported to contain abundance peaks of one or more potential impact-related proxies, including iron-enriched or glassy microspherules, meltglass, charcoal, aciniform carbon, soot, glasslike carbon, carbon microspherules, nanodiamonds, PAHs, Pt, Ir, and Ni, among others [5,7,13,15,16,22,23]. Some YDIH critics consider these YDB proxies individually in isolation, claiming they are merely coincidentally associated, and they invoke alternative hypotheses for each proxy's provenance [104,[110][111][112][113]. However, no critic has identified any other non-impact layer that coincidentally contains the broad suite of these proxies found in the YDB layer.…”
Section: The Ydb As An "Impact Spherule Datum Layer"mentioning
confidence: 99%