2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive abundance analysis of red giants in the open clusters NGC 1342, 1662, 1912, 2354 and 2447

Abstract: We have analyzed high-resolution echelle spectra of red giant members for seven open clusters in the Galactic anticentre direction to explore their chemical compositions. Cluster membership has been confirmed by radial velocity. The spread in temperatures and gravities being very small among the red giants, nearly the same stellar lines were employed for all stars thereby reducing the abundance errors: the errors of the average abundance for a cluster were generally in the 0.02 to 0.05 dex range. Our present s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
68
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
9
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematic offsets between chemical abundances of OCs collected from different resources and our sample of 28 OCs are negligible as we have remeasured the chemical content of all 51 OCs drawn from the literature using their published EWs, our models, linelists and reference solar abundances. The chemical abundances of 51 OCs are presented previously in Table 13 from Reddy et al (2015). Stars in our sample and those drawn from the literature are similar red giants analysed identically and, thus, systematic errors affecting the abundances and abundance ratios [X/Fe] should be consistent (and small) across the sample which spans a narrow range in metallicity of ∼ −0.5 to 0.3 dex but a good range in ages and Galactocentric distances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Systematic offsets between chemical abundances of OCs collected from different resources and our sample of 28 OCs are negligible as we have remeasured the chemical content of all 51 OCs drawn from the literature using their published EWs, our models, linelists and reference solar abundances. The chemical abundances of 51 OCs are presented previously in Table 13 from Reddy et al (2015). Stars in our sample and those drawn from the literature are similar red giants analysed identically and, thus, systematic errors affecting the abundances and abundance ratios [X/Fe] should be consistent (and small) across the sample which spans a narrow range in metallicity of ∼ −0.5 to 0.3 dex but a good range in ages and Galactocentric distances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…6 The adopted interstellar extinctions are (A V , A K , E(V-K), E(J-K))= (3.1, 0.28, 2.75, 0.54)*E(B-V), where E(B-V) is taken from WEBDA We performed a differential abundance analysis relative to the Sun by running the abfind driver of MOOG 7 adopting the 1D model atmospheres and the iron line equivalent widths (EWs) following the local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) abundance analysis technique described in Reddy et al (2015). The line EWs for a selected sample of clean, unblended, isolated and symmetric spectral lines of various atomic/ionic species were measured manually using routines in IRAF while avoiding the wavelength regions affected by telluric contamination and heavy line crowding.…”
Section: Abundance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations