2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition and surface chemistry engineering of graphene grafting chitosan for stimuli-responsive cancer therapy: An in-silico study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation boxes for these systems were 20 × 20 × 20 nm. For docking simulations, rst, the AutoDock Tool-1.5.6 and the gasteiger charge were added to the spike protein PDB le, and polar hydrogen was added to the ACE2 PDB le 42 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation boxes for these systems were 20 × 20 × 20 nm. For docking simulations, rst, the AutoDock Tool-1.5.6 and the gasteiger charge were added to the spike protein PDB le, and polar hydrogen was added to the ACE2 PDB le 42 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation boxes for these systems were 20 × 20 × 20 nm. For docking simulations, first, the AutoDock Tool-1.5.6 and the gasteiger charge were added to the spike protein PDB file, and polar hydrogen was added to the ACE2 PDB file 40 . Then the files were saved in pdbqt format.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%