1983
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198310000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of Muscle-Flap Transposition for Traumatic Defects of the Leg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 In the study of Kaukmann et al (2004) partial necrosis in one and flap failure in on patient (out of 12 patients), and that of Neale et al (1982) were 8 and 5 respectively (out of 71 patients). 18,19 In the study of Pu (2006), one patient developed flap necrosis (out of 14 patients) and was treated by debridement and flap advancement. Chittoria & Mishra (2000) reported 5% partial flap necrosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3 In the study of Kaukmann et al (2004) partial necrosis in one and flap failure in on patient (out of 12 patients), and that of Neale et al (1982) were 8 and 5 respectively (out of 71 patients). 18,19 In the study of Pu (2006), one patient developed flap necrosis (out of 14 patients) and was treated by debridement and flap advancement. Chittoria & Mishra (2000) reported 5% partial flap necrosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The overall complication rate was 25.8% which is similar to reported rates for free flaps ranging from 16% to 38%. 26,27,[33][34][35] The primary complications were partial flap necrosis and venous congestion, however only 6.45% required surgical reintervention. The flap failure rate was 1.1% which is lower than the reported failure rate of free flaps (4% to 19%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neale et al . [ 44 ] reported on major or minor complication at the lower extremity in 32% of cases of a total of 95 muscle flaps, and they agreed that the causes were mainly technical errors, inadequate debridement, use of diseased or traumatized muscle, and unrealistic objectives. For treatment of recalcitrant hip joint infection the interposition of the vastus lateralis and/ or rectus femoris muscle has proven to be useful and reliable [ 45 - 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%