2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications After Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Using a Single Adjustable–Loop-Length Suspensory Fixation Device in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, using the lateral portal as the secondary viewing portal facilitated the manipulation of the TightRope buttons from the anterior and posterior portals. A recent study of Shin and Kim 25) showed a complication rate of 44% in a case series with 18 patients after a single adjustable loop-length suspensory fixation for acute AC dislocation. They described one case of delayed distal clavicular fracture at the clavicular hole of the device, in addition to 3 cases of clavicular or coracoid button failures and 3 cases of clavicular bony erosion after a mean follow-up of 25.6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, using the lateral portal as the secondary viewing portal facilitated the manipulation of the TightRope buttons from the anterior and posterior portals. A recent study of Shin and Kim 25) showed a complication rate of 44% in a case series with 18 patients after a single adjustable loop-length suspensory fixation for acute AC dislocation. They described one case of delayed distal clavicular fracture at the clavicular hole of the device, in addition to 3 cases of clavicular or coracoid button failures and 3 cases of clavicular bony erosion after a mean follow-up of 25.6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rate of loss of reduction is significantly higher than reported in double-bundle CC ligament reconstructions, which have demonstrated a 4.8% reduction loss after 2 years of follow-up. [2][3][4][5] To evaluate which fixation method was biomechanically superior, the authors used 8 cadaveric specimens and evaluated AC joint transition and rotational stability using a 3-dimensional system, after each of the 4 fixation methods. With regard to AC joint translation, the authors examined native and reconstructed AC joint anteroposterior (AP) and superoinferior translation using 10 and 15 N loads.…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 2983mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] For instance, CC screw fixation is the strongest type of fixation. Despite this, there are numerous complications from its use including iatrogenic fracture, hardware migration, and the need for hardware removal with remaining stress risers.…”
Section: Performing Final Closurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] Arthroscopic cortical fixation techniques are less invasive but do not anatomically reconstruct the acromioclavicular ligaments. 9,10 Furthermore, these often need to be performed acutely unless a graft is used. The Weaver-Dunn technique involves transfer of the coracoacromial ligament to the distal clavicle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%