2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01380-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complication rate was 20.7% (6/29) in the varus group, 12.7% (9/71) in the normal group, and 12.9% (4/31) in the valgus group, with the varus group showing a significantly higher complication rate compared to the other two groups ( P < 0.05). Published literature has reported complication rates of 10%–36% after the treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates and 12%–59% after intramedullary nails 18,19 . The complication rate found in our study is relatively low, probably because our cohort was relatively young, had generally good bone stock, and 2‐part proximal humerus fractures accounted for nearly 1/3 of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…The complication rate was 20.7% (6/29) in the varus group, 12.7% (9/71) in the normal group, and 12.9% (4/31) in the valgus group, with the varus group showing a significantly higher complication rate compared to the other two groups ( P < 0.05). Published literature has reported complication rates of 10%–36% after the treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates and 12%–59% after intramedullary nails 18,19 . The complication rate found in our study is relatively low, probably because our cohort was relatively young, had generally good bone stock, and 2‐part proximal humerus fractures accounted for nearly 1/3 of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…In a recent comparative, multicenter, retrospective study, 5 it was observed that if the medial hinge is preserved, locking plate is recommended; in other cases, both devices can be used. In 2019, Lorenz et al 13 stated that just hundred half of the patients with three-four part fractures treated with these devices suffered at least one complication (screw perforation; nonunion and avascular necrosis). Recently, Gumina et al 7 proposed to fix a reduced (through a mini open delto-pectoral approach e 2 cm) three-part humeral head fracture using, for 45 days, BTWs, percutaneously inserted in such a way as to always obtain the same isostatic construct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locking plates and intramedullary nail are the most commonly used devices for the fixation of three-part humeral head fractures, each of which should be used depending on the characteristics of the fracture (integrity of the medial hinge and of the lateral and medial columns), patient age, and osteoporosis degree. 5,11,13 Literature data indicate that the use of these fixation systems involves a percentage of major complications (avascular necrosis, nonunion, and sintering) that ranges from 9% to 40%. 4,6,11,15,18 Recently, fixation of complex three-part humeral head fractures through a system of blocked threaded wires (BTWs) and a mini (2.5 cm) deltopectoral approach has been reported to lead to similar clinical and radiological outcomes with respect to locking plate and nail, 7 but major complication rate was quite lower.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent comparative, multicenter, retrospective study, 5 it was observed that if the medial hinge is preserved, locking plate is recommended; in other cases, both devices can be used. In 2019, Lorenz et al 13 stated that just hundred half of the patients with three-four part fractures treated with these devices suffered at least one complication (screw perforation; nonunion and avascular necrosis). Recently, Gumina et al 7 proposed to fix a reduced (through a mini open delto-pectoral approach – 2 cm) three-part humeral head fracture using, for 45 days, BTWs, percutaneously inserted in such a way as to always obtain the same isostatic construct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%