2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex structure of Piton de la Fournaise and its underlying lithosphere revealed by magnetotelluric 3D inversion

Abstract: La Réunion is a large volcanic construction resting on Paleocene oceanic crust. Through the 3D inversion of a large set of magnetotelluric (MT) soundings, our results reveal the general resistivity structure of the western part of Piton de la Fournaise volcano down to its base and the first ten kilometers or so of the underlying lithosphere. The upper resistive layer is associated to a superimposition of unsaturated and probably water-saturated lava flows with an averaged thickness of 1.5 km overlying more or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our AEM global resistivity model is in good agreement with the geo-electrical models deduced from previous geophysical studies 17,20 , validating the global trend of our more detailed imagery. At the near-surface, the resistive layer - several hundred meters thick - corresponds to recent lava flows.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our AEM global resistivity model is in good agreement with the geo-electrical models deduced from previous geophysical studies 17,20 , validating the global trend of our more detailed imagery. At the near-surface, the resistive layer - several hundred meters thick - corresponds to recent lava flows.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Among others, ground resistivity imagery techniques, such as 2D or 3D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) 10,14,15 , magnetotellurics (MT) and transient electromagnetic soundings (TDEM) 16,17 , are renowned for being well-suited and reliable in such settings. While ERT oftenly provides high resolution imagery of the first hundred meters 18,19 , MT and TDEM provide a smoother image of the bulk resistivity up to few kilometres depth 20 . All these methods have been improved during the last decades to image resistivity variations in 3D 19,20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electrical resistivity values range from 2.5 to 2,200 Ω•m, and thus agree with the previous 1-D resistivity model obtained at Miyakejima by Zlotnicki et al (2003) from audio-magnetotellurics soundings. This resistivity range is also consistent with several volcanic islands (e.g., Gailler et al, 2018;Piña-Varas et al, 2018;Pryet et al, 2012;Revil et al, 2011) and continental arc volcanoes (e.g., Aizawa et al, 2005;Heise et al, 2016).…”
Section: Description Of the Main Unitssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In Miyakejima, a sharp resistivity contrast exists between the superficial high-resistive materials ('u' unit) and the underlying conductive ones ('c' unit). Such vertical variation is often observed on active volcanoes that include significant topography and meteoric recharge (e.g., Aizawa et al, 2005;Gailler et al, 2018;Piña-Varas et al, 2014;Revil et al, 2011;Rosas-Carbajal et al, 2016;Triahadini et al, 2019;Usui et al, 2016). This change in electrical resistivity is generally interpreted as a shift from unsaturated to water-saturated regime, delimiting the water table boundary of the volcano (e.g., Aizawa et al, 2009;Hurwitz et al, 2003).…”
Section: Unsaturated Deposits and Water Tablementioning
confidence: 99%