Completeness and correctness of acute myocardial infarction diagnoses in a medical quality register and an administrative health register

Abstract

Aims: Health registers are used for administrative purposes, disease surveillance, quality assessment, and research. The value of the registers is entirely dependent on the quality of their data. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the completeness and correctness of the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosis in the Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Register and in the Norwegian Patient Register. Methods: All Norwegian patients admitted directly to St Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital from 1 July to 31 December 2012 and who had plasma levels of cardiac troponin T measured during their hospitalization ( n=4835 unique individuals, n=5882 hospitalizations) were identified in the hospital biochemical database. A gold standard for AMI was established by evaluation of maximum troponin T levels and by review of the information in the medical records. Cases of AMI in the registers were classified as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative according to the gold standard. We calculated sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: The Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Register had a sensitivity of 86.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.8–89.3%), PPV of 97.9% (96.4–99.3%), and specificity of 99.9% and NPV of 98.9% (98.6-99.2%) (99.8–100%). The corresponding figures for the Norwegian Patient Register were 85.8% (95% CI 82.5–89.1%), 95.1% (92.9–97.2%), and 99.7% (99.5–99.8%) and 98.9% (98.6-99.2%), respectively. Both registers had a sensitivity higher than 95% when compared to hospital discharge diagnoses. The results were similar for men and women and for cases below and above 80 years of age. Conclusions: The Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Register and the Norwegian Patient Register are adequately complete and correct for administrative purposes, disease surveillance, quality assessment, and research.

Hospitalised patients with unexplained chest pain: incidence and prognosis

“…Another limitation involves the under ascertainment of secondary diagnoses precluding the evaluation of their contribution to prognosis. However, the sensitivity and specificity of acute myocardial infarction as discharge diagnosis in the Norwegian Patient Registry are acceptable .…”

Trends in life expectancy: did the gap between the healthy and the ill widen or close?

“…This study is based on data from the entire Swedish population, including frail and disadvantaged population groups. The Swedish population registers have high levels of completeness and validity [26][27][28], and the diseases we examined are among the most common medical conditions that occur at older ages, not only in Sweden, but in many other countries with a similar age structure and disease panorama. During the period under study, no screening programs were introduced for the cancer types included in our analyses.…”

“…The NPR contains data on all hospitalizations in Sweden. The register also provides particularly good coverage for these diseases, because they almost always require hospitalization, have a clear onset, and are usually accurately diagnosed [26,27]. As reporting to the Swedish Cancer register is mandated by law, the register has an estimated completeness exceeding 95% [28].…”

Heart failure in Norway, 2000–2014: analysing incident, total and readmission rates using data from the Cardiovascular Disease in Norway (CVDNOR) Project

“…Although the quality of coding CVD conditions in administrative data in Norway is good, no previous study has specifically focused on HF in Norway. Based on studies from other Nordic countries, the positive predictive value and specificity of HF is high but its sensitivity is lower …”