2010
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2009.2028617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Open Loop Control of Hysteretic, Creeped, and Oscillating Piezoelectric Cantilevers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the procedure in [16], the identification of the parameters r i and w i is performed by applying a sine or a triangular input voltage u(t) with an amplitude u A to the process. This amplitude corresponds to the maximal output of y that is expected for the applications.…”
Section: Parameters Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the procedure in [16], the identification of the parameters r i and w i is performed by applying a sine or a triangular input voltage u(t) with an amplitude u A to the process. This amplitude corresponds to the maximal output of y that is expected for the applications.…”
Section: Parameters Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an automatic point of view, feedforward voltage control is particularly appreciated because this approach allows stability, performance analysis and controllers synthesis. For piezoactuators, there exist several approaches of hysteresis compensation based on voltage control: the Bouc-Wen [11], the polynomial [12], the lookup tables [13], the Preisach [14][15] and the classical PrandtlIshlinskii approaches [16][17] [18]. The Prandtl-Ishlinskii approach is particularly appreciated for its simplicity, ease of implementation and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, techniques such as input shaping can be utilized to mitigate vibration 121 . However, the accuracy of feedforward techniques is dependent on both the model and the parameters identified in the model, which can change over time, especially in dynamic scenarios and the vacuum environment inside an SEM 122 . Feedback control utilizes sensor feedback, relaxes modeling requirements, and achieves better performance in terms of accuracy, vibration suppression, and uncertainty/disturbance rejection 61 .…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches used for Γ (u(s)) in PEA, for instance: the Prandtl-Ishlinskii approach [5][6][7]20,21], the Preisach approach [22][23][24], the Bouc-Wen approach [25][26][27][28], the quadrilateral and multilinear approach [6][7][8]11,29]. It is noteworthy that the nonlinear model in Equations (4) and (5) come down to a linear model when the hysteresis and the creep are negligible.…”
Section: Pea Nonlinear Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been carried out regarding voltage control of hysteresis [16][17][18][19][20]24,25,27,28], creep [9], and of underdamped vibrations [35,36] in PEA, or their control simultaneously [10,21]. The main limitation of feed-forward control is the restricted robustness to model uncertainties and external disturbances.…”
Section: Pea Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%