2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.94.062301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition of simple and complex adoption on interdependent networks

Abstract: We consider the competition of two mechanisms for adoption processes: a so-called complex threshold dynamics and a simple susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) model. Separately, these mechanisms lead, respectively, to first-order and continuous transitions between nonadoption and adoption phases. We consider two interconnected layers. While all nodes on the first layer follow the complex adoption process, all nodes on the second layer follow the simple adoption process. Coupling between the two adoption proc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These models were then extended to study social contagions, particularly interacting, antagonistic contagions [31][32][33], and their cascading behaviors on multiplex networks [34][35][36][37]. Shu et al [38] present the dynamics of social contagions on two interdependent two-dimensional lattices, and give examples of nodes in communication networks which are spatially embedded [39][40][41].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models were then extended to study social contagions, particularly interacting, antagonistic contagions [31][32][33], and their cascading behaviors on multiplex networks [34][35][36][37]. Shu et al [38] present the dynamics of social contagions on two interdependent two-dimensional lattices, and give examples of nodes in communication networks which are spatially embedded [39][40][41].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of this 85%, almost 62% are the studies where virus/disease compete with awareness/information, and over 23% constitutes literature where two viruses/diseases interact with each other. Another group, although much smaller, constitutes opinion/meme spread where we can have two memes [61] and [62] or opinion [89] spreading over the multilayer network. Other variations are where on one layer spreads opinion and on another (i) virus [91] [113], (ii) decision making process [115], or (iii) adoption of green behaviour [114].…”
Section: A What Spreads?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [89], authors propose to have M interlayer edges between two layers that randomly connect nodes between two layers. Thus, the change in the node opinion is affected both by the neighbours in its layer and by the neighbours in the other layer.…”
Section: ) Edges Between Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, they note URL sharing is competitive. The focus of theoretical models has been diverse, ranging from a pair of simple and complex layers [25], to trusted and distrusted edges between layers [26]. These studies focus on competing contagions, though recently there has been directed research effort toward synergy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%