2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between enzymatic and non-enzymatic electrochemical determination of cholesterol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrochemical methods are reported to be highly sensitive and selective techniques for nitrite detection in contaminated water. Thus, there are many advantages, such as low cost, fast response, simplicity, and reproducibility [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemical methods are reported to be highly sensitive and selective techniques for nitrite detection in contaminated water. Thus, there are many advantages, such as low cost, fast response, simplicity, and reproducibility [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In this context, due to the low cost of both materials sources and production, as well as versatile and easily adjustable design, non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors are a relevant option for the analysis of cholesterol and other biomolecules. 7,8 To enhance the electrochemical response of non-enzymatic sensors, electrodes can be modified with metallic species to achieve high sensitivity, 9 for example, silver, 10 gold 11 and nickel, 12 and be explored for the determination of cholesterol. Nickel has been widely used in non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors for cholesterol determination due to its low cost compared to noble metals, high stability in alkaline solutions, and reproducibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [6], and HPLC [7] involve high instrument costs, skilled operators, chemical solvents, difficult sample preparation, and extended analysis times [8]. Electrochemical sensors [9], on the other hand, are becoming more relevant as bioanalytical sensing instruments for identifying CH and offer a range of benefits, including low cost, rapid testing times, portability, miniaturization, and high sensitivity [10]. There are two types of electrochemical methods for detecting CH: enzymatic and nonenzymatic [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%