2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.060403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing magnetic fluctuations inSr3Ru2O7probed by Ti doping

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the interpretation in Ref. 13, the character of the magnetic ordering in Sr 3 ͑Ru 1−x Ti x ͒ 2 O 7 is not ferromagnetic but a spindensity wave close to the commensurate quarter-indexed order of up-up-down-down configuration, which has been reported for Mn-doped Sr 3 Ru 2 O 7 .…”
Section: Static Spin-density Wave Orderingcontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the interpretation in Ref. 13, the character of the magnetic ordering in Sr 3 ͑Ru 1−x Ti x ͒ 2 O 7 is not ferromagnetic but a spindensity wave close to the commensurate quarter-indexed order of up-up-down-down configuration, which has been reported for Mn-doped Sr 3 Ru 2 O 7 .…”
Section: Static Spin-density Wave Orderingcontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…This maximum is rapidly suppressed by the Ti doping. 13 Furthermore, the signature of the metamagnetic transition in the magnetization versus magnetic field curves disappears for a Ti content of 4% in the crystals studied in Ref. 13 as well as in our crystals.…”
Section: Macroscopic Measurementssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[11][12][13] The negative Weiss temperature of Sr 3 Ru 2 O 7 suggests that AFM correlations dominate its magnetic ground state; this point of view has been confirmed in neutron scattering and nuclear magnetic resonance measurements. 11,12 The decrease in negative Weiss temperature for ͑Sr 0.9 Ca 0.1 ͒ 3 Ru 2 O 7 suggests that the Ca substitution for Sr suppresses the AFM correlations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%