2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of void fraction correlations for different flow patterns in horizontal and upward inclined pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
215
2
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
215
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to implement because the void fraction is expressed as an explicit function of the total mass flux. It has been shown that the Steiner version of the Rouhani-Axelsson drift flux model can also be used to estimate the void fraction for inclined and vertical flows with reasonable accuracy (capturing > 80% date points with < 15% error) [60]. The Steiner version of the Rouhani-Axelsson drift flux model was consequently an accurate model to flexibly investigate either horizontal, inclined or vertical configurations.…”
Section: Two-phase Flow Model Inside Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to implement because the void fraction is expressed as an explicit function of the total mass flux. It has been shown that the Steiner version of the Rouhani-Axelsson drift flux model can also be used to estimate the void fraction for inclined and vertical flows with reasonable accuracy (capturing > 80% date points with < 15% error) [60]. The Steiner version of the Rouhani-Axelsson drift flux model was consequently an accurate model to flexibly investigate either horizontal, inclined or vertical configurations.…”
Section: Two-phase Flow Model Inside Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available void fraction measurements in helical coils [7,9,10,14,16,18] suggest that curvature effects on the void fraction are small and negligible, so that straight tube void fraction prediction methods can be extrapolated to helically coiled tubes, at least in first approximation. Therefore, the void fraction prediction method of Woldesemayat and Ghajar [51] was used here, as this is one of the most accurate general purpose void fraction correlations currently available for straight tubes [50]. Notably, with the databank in Table 1 the acceleration and gravitational components of the pressure gradient never account for more than 10-20% of the total pressure gradient, so that the void fraction prediction method used in the analysis has little impact on the final results.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive lists of void fraction models and correlations for internal flow are given by Rice (1987), Woldesemayat and Ghajar (2007), and Dalkilic et al (2008). Among them, one of the most common are the slip ratio correlations, where the void fraction depends on the vapour quality and some fluid properties (Wallis, 1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%