1982
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90023-5
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Comparison of visually estimated age with physiologically predicted age as indicators of rates of aging

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
20
6
4
2

Citation Types

2
19
0
0

Year Published

Range
1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
23
3
1
1

Relationship

1
27

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 28 publications

(21 citation statements)
references

References 14 publications

2
19
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Some of our results were similar to previously published data, e.g., the ICC [15], the notion of regression to the mean [3, 16] and that the mean perceived age of an average participant, as estimated by facial photographs, was approximately 2 years lower than the mean chronological age [17, 18]. Furthermore, we found a statistically significant correlation between perceived age and chronological age, as reported by Gunn et al [11] and Christensen et al [1].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the 95% limits of agreements showed a tendency that assessors agreed only somewhat better with themselves than with other assessors when the age of a participant was assessed from two different photographic presentations. Some of our results were similar to previously published data, e.g., the ICC [15] , the notion of regression to the mean [3,16] and that the mean perceived age of an average participant, as estimated by facial photographs, was approximately 2 years lower than the mean chronological age [17,18] . Furthermore, we found a statistically significant correlation between perceived age and chronological age, as reported by Gunn et al [11] and Christensen et al [1] .…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation