2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two empirical prolonged infusion dosing regimens for meropenem in patients with septic shock: A two-center pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding poor clinical outcomes associated with elevated meropenem MIC [18][19][20], the development of guidance for appropriate meropenem dosage optimization for empirical treatment should be considered to overcome antimicrobial resistance in the ICU [21]. High-dosage regimens of meropenem using prolonged infusion over 3 h could be considered for the empirical treatment in critically ill patients [22][23][24][25], which is supported by our simulation results revealing the low PTA of empirical therapy using the current dosing regimen. Previous studies have reported the positive impact of prolonged meropenem infusion on clinical outcomes such as hospital mortality in critically ill patients [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Regarding poor clinical outcomes associated with elevated meropenem MIC [18][19][20], the development of guidance for appropriate meropenem dosage optimization for empirical treatment should be considered to overcome antimicrobial resistance in the ICU [21]. High-dosage regimens of meropenem using prolonged infusion over 3 h could be considered for the empirical treatment in critically ill patients [22][23][24][25], which is supported by our simulation results revealing the low PTA of empirical therapy using the current dosing regimen. Previous studies have reported the positive impact of prolonged meropenem infusion on clinical outcomes such as hospital mortality in critically ill patients [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The concentration-time profile of meropenem was predicted for each patient based on a previously published meropenem population PK model in conjunction with the patient's dosing history and specific covariates, because meropenem concentrations were not available from the patients. In total, five two-compartment population PK models of meropenem in patients in the ICU were identified in literature, [26][27][28][29][30] and the PK model developed by Ehmann et al was selected as the model most representative of the study population due to its inclusion of multiple covariate relationships based on a wide distribution of covariate values, as well as similar population characteristics as the study patients. 29 Briefly, the population PK model had been built upon densely sampled meropenem serum concentrations (1376 observations) in 41 non-CRRT critically ill patients (mostly patients with sepsis) receiving standard dosing of meropenem (1000 mg as 30-min i.v.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Model Derived Pk/pd Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherent villi, capsules, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and glycosylated lipids or iron carriers constitute the main virulence factors leading to CRKP pathogenicity, and multiple mechanisms of drug resistance exist, of which carbapenemase (KPC) and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) production are the most common. 5 Previous studies [6][7][8] showed that when the MIC of CRKP to carbapenems is less than 16 mg/L, infection treatment can be achieved through appropriate dose increases of carbapenems, longer infusion times, and shorter dosing intervals. However, for high-level CRKP strains (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), carbapenems are no longer available for the treatment of this type of infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%