2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Different Ultrasound Methods of Phacoemulsification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of US modalities is frequently debated [1][2][3][4][5] while objective comparative studies are lacking as it is virtually impossible to select comparable groups [6]. The difficulties in the correct preoperative evaluation of the nuclei hardness and variability in lens sizes make it hard to objectively assess the advantages of phaco parameters in the traditionally designed comparative studies, which may look like an Bapples to oranges^rather than Bapples to apples^comparison of technologies [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Comparison of US modalities is frequently debated [1][2][3][4][5] while objective comparative studies are lacking as it is virtually impossible to select comparable groups [6]. The difficulties in the correct preoperative evaluation of the nuclei hardness and variability in lens sizes make it hard to objectively assess the advantages of phaco parameters in the traditionally designed comparative studies, which may look like an Bapples to oranges^rather than Bapples to apples^comparison of technologies [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The efficiency of torsional phacoemulsification is influenced by the tip's anatomy . On the other hand, longitudinal phacoemulsification works by forward and backward movement of the phaco tip using the jackhammer effect . The drawback of torsional phacoemulsification is clogging, which can be prevented by a short burst of longitudinal phaco to avoid this complication …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 On the other hand, longitudinal phacoemulsification works by forward and backward movement of the phaco tip using the jackhammer effect. 3,11,13 The drawback of torsional phacoemulsification is clogging, which can be prevented by a short burst of longitudinal phaco to avoid this complication. 3,4,11,13 We designed a study to assess the clinical effects of two phaco tips, Intrepid balanced tip (BT) and Kelman tapered tip (TT), by comparing the intraoperative and short-term outcome of upgraded torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto es debido a que la repulsión apenas existe, a diferencia de lo que ocurre con la energía longitudinal. La fractura de la catarata ocurre por cizallamiento y no solamente por el efecto de martillo neumático convencional 3,5,[8][9][10]111,113,114 .…”
Section: B5 Facoemulsificaciónunclassified
“…La reducción de potencia de los US y la mejora de su eficiencia son los principales objetivos para reducir este efecto. A pesar de todos los avances, la cirugía moderna de la catarata condiciona una pérdida de un 5-15% de las CEC, frente a las técnicas más antiguas que condicionaban una mayor pérdida endotelial [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][113][114][115] .…”
Section: B5 Facoemulsificaciónunclassified