2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4898157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two- and three-dimensional simulations of miscible Richtmyer-Meshkov instability with multimode initial conditions

Abstract: A comparison between two- and three-dimensional large-eddy simulations of the planar Richtmyer-Meshkov instability with multimode initial conditions is made. The three-dimensional calculation achieves a turbulent state where an inertial range of length scales is present after the second shock wave impacts the interface. Grid independence of the mixing width up until the time of reshock is demonstrated through mesh refinement in both two and three dimensions. Quantitative measures of mixing are compared includi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this Reynolds number, one expects three-dimensional effects to become important, and the flow to become turbulent. Nevertheless, consistent with previous studies (see for example [28,29]), we neglect the three-dimensional effects, leaving that for further study in the future. The shock-tube numerical experiments were performed in a two-dimensional domain of size [15λ 0 × 2.5λ 0 ] discretized with a base mesh of resolution [480 × 80].…”
Section: Physical Domain and Simulation Setupsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…At this Reynolds number, one expects three-dimensional effects to become important, and the flow to become turbulent. Nevertheless, consistent with previous studies (see for example [28,29]), we neglect the three-dimensional effects, leaving that for further study in the future. The shock-tube numerical experiments were performed in a two-dimensional domain of size [15λ 0 × 2.5λ 0 ] discretized with a base mesh of resolution [480 × 80].…”
Section: Physical Domain and Simulation Setupsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The decrease of the mixing width around 3.3 ms corresponds to compression from the reflected shock, while the inflection around 4.5 ms corresponds to interaction of the mixing layer with the rarefaction wave. Such features are observed in both LES [46,62,63] as well as RANS simulations [29,57,64,65] of reshocked RM mixing layers. Morgan and Wickett previously demonstrated a similar level of agreement between simulation and experiment for the k-L-a model [56].…”
Section: B Richtmyer-meshkov Mixingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The Miranda code solves the hydrodynamics equations presented in section II A with a tenth-order compact differencing scheme for spatial discretization and a fourthorder explicit Runge-Kutta scheme for temporal integration. It has been utilized extensively in previous studies of RT and RM mixing [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. To model the subgrid scale (SGS) transfer of energy, Miranda utilizes an artificial fluid LES (AFLES) approach in which artificial transport terms are added to the fluid viscosity, the bulk viscosity, the thermal conductivity, and the molecular diffusivity [48,49].…”
Section: B the Miranda Codementioning
confidence: 99%