2011
DOI: 10.1002/uog.9072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of transvaginal sonography and double‐contrast barium enema for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis of the posterior compartment

Abstract: Objectives To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) in the preoperative detection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) of the posterior compartment. Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of TVS for detecting posterior and lateral DIE lesions (rectum, sigmoid USL, parametria, ureter) is in agreement with previous studies (6,16,18). The rectum, sigmoid, and rectovaginal septum are often considered together, and the Douglas obliteration was described as an indirect sign of DIE (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of TVS for detecting posterior and lateral DIE lesions (rectum, sigmoid USL, parametria, ureter) is in agreement with previous studies (6,16,18). The rectum, sigmoid, and rectovaginal septum are often considered together, and the Douglas obliteration was described as an indirect sign of DIE (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To detect DIE extension into the pelvis, use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and transvaginal sonography (TVS) (6,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) have been described. The MRI provides accurate information about lesions located on the upper level of the sigmoid, but for pelvic disease TVS is equally accurate and is considered the first and most widely used diagnostic tool (6,(18)(19)(20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savelli et al [65] compared transvaginal sonography and DCBE in the diagnosis of bowel DIE in terms of presence or absence of the lesion. They reported a sensitivity for ultrasound of 91% and for DBCE 43%; specificity was 100% and 100%, positive predictive value was 100% and 100%, negative predictive value was 29% and 6% and accuracy was 91% and 45%, respectively.…”
Section: Double-contrast Barium Enemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habár a vizsgálóeljárások közül a CT, virtuális kolonoszkópia [19] és akár az irrigoszkópia [20] is szóba jönne, a fertilis korú, gyakran nullipara nők miatt ezeknek a rutinszerű alkalmazása a sugárterhelés miatt nem javasolt. A bélfalban, illetve a bélfalon kívül elhelyezkedő elválto-zások diagnózisánál a rectalis ultrahangvizsgálat jó szenzitivitással bír, de biztonsággal csak 12-13 cm magassá-gig használható, és a szűkület, illetve megtöretés miatt gyakran még ez a magasság sem érhető el az eszköz számára.…”
Section: Megbeszélésunclassified