2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of traditional and backslopping methods for kefir fermentation based on physicochemical and microbiological characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The counts of yeasts in the analyzed Gioddu samples were almost in accordance with those reported by Kebede et al (2007) in Sethemi, a South African spontaneously fermented milk, where counts of approximately 6 log cfu mL -1 were detected. Yeast counts detected in Gioddu were also comparable with those reported by Kim et al (2018a) and Guzel-Seydim et al (2005) in milk kefir beverage that showed values of 6 log cfu mL -1 , thus suggesting similarities between Gioddu and this well-known health-promoting beverage, although the relative proportion of each microbial group should also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The counts of yeasts in the analyzed Gioddu samples were almost in accordance with those reported by Kebede et al (2007) in Sethemi, a South African spontaneously fermented milk, where counts of approximately 6 log cfu mL -1 were detected. Yeast counts detected in Gioddu were also comparable with those reported by Kim et al (2018a) and Guzel-Seydim et al (2005) in milk kefir beverage that showed values of 6 log cfu mL -1 , thus suggesting similarities between Gioddu and this well-known health-promoting beverage, although the relative proportion of each microbial group should also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The kefir grains are inoculated into sterilized milk and fermented at 25 • C until a pH of 4.4 is reached. The grain and milk are then separated using a sterilized plastic filter at the end of the fermentation process [17]. In contrast, water kefir is a homemade fermented beverage based on a sucrose solution with different dried and fresh fruits.…”
Section: Prebiotic Additives and Production Methods Employed In Kefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fermentation step is used to speed up the microorganisms' action and the metabolic changes occurring in milk composition [20]. A backslopping strategy is employed to increase kefir beverage generation, with a 50-fold production yield increase while maintaining the same kefir characteristics (physicochemical, microbiological and nutritional value) as traditional kefir except for the differences in the lactobacillus kefir population (7.94 vs. 8.89 log CFU/mL) and decreased yeast count (7.1 vs. 5.22 log CFU/mL) [17]. This method is considered cheap and reliable, especially in less developed countries, with only a few shortcomings observed in product consistency and microbiological diversity.…”
Section: Prebiotic Additives and Production Methods Employed In Kefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devido ao baixo conteúdo de minerais presentes neste prebiótico, justifica-se o resultado obtido (Da Silva et al, 2017). Embora não esteja definido na legislação os teores de cinzas para leites fermentados, os valores obtidos para todas as formulações são similares aos encontrados por Kim et al (2018) em kefir tradicional, com valor médio de 0,7 %. As formulações FS2 e FS3 não diferiram entre si no teor de carboidratos e valor energético.…”
Section: Formulaçõesunclassified