2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.03.010
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the wake recovery of the axial-flow and cross-flow turbine concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among such studies, Paik et al [7] compared the performances of the URANS approach to different DES methodologies for the flow around two wall-mounted cubes in tandem, Nasif et al [8] investigated the wake characteristics of sharp-edged bluff body in a shallow flow, Muld et al [9] observed the flow structures in the wake of a high-speed train and Muscari et al [1] used this approach to study the wake of a marine propeller and observed a good agreement with the experimental results of Felli et al [10]. Lastly, the authors of the current work have also used this turbulence modeling approach to study the vortex dynamics and the wake recovery of two different types of hydrokinetic turbines, namely the horizontal axis and the vertical axis turbines [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Among such studies, Paik et al [7] compared the performances of the URANS approach to different DES methodologies for the flow around two wall-mounted cubes in tandem, Nasif et al [8] investigated the wake characteristics of sharp-edged bluff body in a shallow flow, Muld et al [9] observed the flow structures in the wake of a high-speed train and Muscari et al [1] used this approach to study the wake of a marine propeller and observed a good agreement with the experimental results of Felli et al [10]. Lastly, the authors of the current work have also used this turbulence modeling approach to study the vortex dynamics and the wake recovery of two different types of hydrokinetic turbines, namely the horizontal axis and the vertical axis turbines [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Several recent studies are devoted to the measurement of the efficiency of straight-bladed CFTs, either in wind or marine applications. 57 For instance, Bravo et al, 8 Takao et al, 9 and Bachant and Wosnik 10 using a turbine with a similar solidity ( σ = Nc / π D ) in the range from 0.13 to 0.16, at several Reynolds numbers based on the turbine diameter ( R e D = u D / ν ) from 3 . 2 × 10 5 to 1 . 7 × 10 6 , obtained similar performance curves. Here, N is the number of blades, c the blade chord, D the rotor diameter, u the freestream velocity, and ν the fluid kinematic viscosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…AbdelSalam et al [23] performed experimental procedure and numerical simulation considering a FRM, RANS k-ε modified for atmospheric flows, 2 MW wind turbine SODAR upstream measurements, and wake LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) measurements at downstream distances from 2 to 7 diameters. Boudreau et al [24] studied the axial-flow and cross-flow configurations operating at respective optimal efficiency, with Reynolds' number around 10 7 , 3D DES (Detached-Eddy Simulation), and Unsteady RANS. Ammara et al [25] developed a RANS steady CVFEM (Control Volume Finite-Element Method) model, considering a two-row periodic wind farm in a neutral ABL.…”
Section: Nrel 5 Mwmentioning
confidence: 99%