2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the performances of nanosecond and femtosecond Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for depth profiling of an artificially corroded bronze

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They established that ns pulses were inadequate to assess the polymer coating on an Al-Mg substrate because of their weak absorption, while fs pulses yielded well-resolved proles with a depth resolution of 1 mm. More recently, de Bonis et al 100 compared 40 ns pulses vs. 40 fs pulses to measure the depth of a patina to clean corroded bronzes. Because the ablation rate of a 40 ns laser was four times larger than that for a 40 fs laser, the resolution of femtosecond LIBS depth proling was better and accuracy with respect to the Cu/Sn ratio was also better due to minimal fractionation.…”
Section: Depth Prolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They established that ns pulses were inadequate to assess the polymer coating on an Al-Mg substrate because of their weak absorption, while fs pulses yielded well-resolved proles with a depth resolution of 1 mm. More recently, de Bonis et al 100 compared 40 ns pulses vs. 40 fs pulses to measure the depth of a patina to clean corroded bronzes. Because the ablation rate of a 40 ns laser was four times larger than that for a 40 fs laser, the resolution of femtosecond LIBS depth proling was better and accuracy with respect to the Cu/Sn ratio was also better due to minimal fractionation.…”
Section: Depth Prolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover there are several advantages in using fs-LA for LIBS and LA-ICP-MS over ns-LA, which include reduced continuum emission, better Paper control of ablation efficiency, particle distribution, elemental fractionation and matrix dependence. The differences in nsand fs-LA are documented in the literature for both LIBS 19,20,26 and LA-ICP-MS 3,6,27,28 applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analytical measurement techniques that involve laser ablation ion sources, for example, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), laser ablation ionization mass spectrometry (LIMS), or laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), shot-to-shot signal variations are expected (e.g., Cui et al, 2012;De Bonis et al, 2014;Gutierrez-Gonzalez et al, 2015). Such variations may arise from various factors, including instability of the used laser system, sample morphology and porosity (voids), and local variations in chemical composition.…”
Section: Identification Of Carbon-rich Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%