2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of entecavir and tenofovir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B patients with high viraemia: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Tenofovir and entecavir have similar effectiveness in NA-naive CHB patients with high viraemia. Tenofovir might have a higher incidence of acute kidney injury compared with entecavir during treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
32
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the overall propensity‐matched pairs, the two treatment groups were also not significantly different regarding the risk of liver‐related death or LT, HCC and other hepatic complications. Moreover, the efficacies of ETV and TDF were satisfactory and consistent with those of previous studies, and adequate for analysing clinical outcomes: VR was achieved in 89.5% of all patients and only 2.2% (15 ETV patients and 16 TDF patients) experienced VBT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the overall propensity‐matched pairs, the two treatment groups were also not significantly different regarding the risk of liver‐related death or LT, HCC and other hepatic complications. Moreover, the efficacies of ETV and TDF were satisfactory and consistent with those of previous studies, and adequate for analysing clinical outcomes: VR was achieved in 89.5% of all patients and only 2.2% (15 ETV patients and 16 TDF patients) experienced VBT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The clinical outcomes, in other words, the incidence of long‐term hepatic complications under long‐term antiviral therapy, are difficult to monitor because cirrhotic complications and HCC take a long time to develop, especially in noncirrhotic patients. Thus, in most clinical trials, VR, biochemical response and histologic response have been used as study endpoints to determine treatment efficacy . However, whether these endpoints can reflect long‐term clinical outcomes is unclear and few studies have directly compared the long‐term clinical outcomes of ETV and TDF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For HBV‐associated HCC patients, the status of HBeAg and HBV‐DNA load were two most important index to assess the viral status. With the advance of antiviral drugs like entecavir and tenofovir, HBV‐DNA seroconversion is achievable; however, these drugs rarely eradicate virus with a low rate of HBeAg seroconversion . The role of positive serum HBeAg, a surrogate marker of viral replication, deserves to be further studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advance of antiviral drugs like entecavir and tenofovir, HBV-DNA seroconversion is achievable; however, these drugs rarely eradicate virus with a low rate of HBeAg seroconversion. 24 The role of positive serum HBeAg, a surrogate marker of viral replication, deserves to be further studied. Active inflammation in the noncancerous liver tissue creates a microenvironment favouring metastatic tumour recurrence and poor prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В исследовании Wu и соавт. СКФ при лечении тенофовиром в течение 3 лет снизилась в среднем на 6,5 мл/мин [22]. Мы также отметили снижение СКФ (в среднем на 12,3 мл/мин) и повышение уровня креатинина сыворотки (в среднем на 14 мкмоль/л) при лечении тенофовиром в течение 5 лет.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified