2021
DOI: 10.1177/15330338211041201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Dosimetric Influence of Applicator Displacement on 2D and 3D Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Treatment

Abstract: To compare the dosimetric influence of applicator displacement on two-dimensional brachytherapy (2D-BT) and three-dimensional brachytherapy (3D-BT) for cervical cancer. Nineteen patients who received computed tomography-guided tandem-and-ovoid (T&O) brachytherapy were retrospectively selected. Both 2D (point-based) and 3D (volume-based) plans with and without virtual applicator displacement in the 3 axes were created for each patient. Dose changes at point A, D90 of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is little published data assessing the dosimetric impact of brachytherapy applicator displacements during image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer [17,18,32]. Our findings demonstrate the clinical significance of even small shifts in IC or IC/IS applicator position, and closely reflect previous studies evaluating IC applicators alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is little published data assessing the dosimetric impact of brachytherapy applicator displacements during image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer [17,18,32]. Our findings demonstrate the clinical significance of even small shifts in IC or IC/IS applicator position, and closely reflect previous studies evaluating IC applicators alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast, we found statistically significant differences at displacements of 5 mm or greater, with an approximate 23% difference in the dose to the HR-CTV D 90% at 10 mm of displacement. A similar study performed by Wu et al modeled displacements for tandem and ovoid applicators, and found reductions in the dose to the HR-CTV D 90% of approximately 15% at 10 mm inferior displacement [17]. The cause for this discrepancy in results between the two studies is not clear, though possibilities would include institutional differences in planning practices, inter-provider differences in contouring technique, and difference in brachytherapy applicator geometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of applicators reconstruction has significant impact on dosimetric results of IGBT treatment plan because of steep dose gradients [9][10][11]. In general, applicators reconstruction are mostly performed manually by physicists.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since cumbersome x-ray/CT/MR machines have not been widely installed in the BT treatment room, patient transfers between the imaging room and the treatment room are inevitable, which usually not only increases patient suffering but also causes organ variations and applicator displacement. During scanning, planning, and treatment, this inconsistency in the patients’ anatomy induces a large dose delivery error since the dose is sharply decreased ( 11 ). Due to its advantages, including low cost, volume imaging, and simple integration, cone-beam CT (CBCT) is promising for resolving all the above adverse factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%