2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4977569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the dislocation density obtained by HR-EBSD and X-ray profile analysis

Abstract: Based on the cross correlation analysis of the Kikuchi diffraction patterns high-resolution EBSD is a well established method to determine the internal stress in deformed crystalline materials. In many cases, however, the stress values obtained at the different scanning points have a large (in the order of GPa) scatter. As it was first demonstrated by Wilkinson and co-workers this is due to the long tail of the probability distribution of the internal stress ($P(\sigma)$) generated by the dislocations p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike conventional EBSD, which struggles to resolve the subtle microstructural changes associated with transient creep at small strains 39 , HR-EBSD provides exceptionally precise estimates of the density of geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs, the fraction of the total dislocation density that generates net lattice curvature and long-range stress heterogeneity) and, importantly, maps heterogeneity in elastic strain and residual stress stored in the samples after the experiments [40][41][42][43] . We analyse the stress distributions in terms of the theory, established in the materials sciences [44][45][46][47] , for stress fields of a population of dislocations to test the causality between stress heterogeneity and the dislocation content (Methods). In particular, we test whether tails of the probability (P) distributions of shear stress (σ 12 ) follow a P(σ 12 ) ∝ |σ 12 | −3 relationship, as expected of stress fields generated by dislocations [44][45][46][47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike conventional EBSD, which struggles to resolve the subtle microstructural changes associated with transient creep at small strains 39 , HR-EBSD provides exceptionally precise estimates of the density of geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs, the fraction of the total dislocation density that generates net lattice curvature and long-range stress heterogeneity) and, importantly, maps heterogeneity in elastic strain and residual stress stored in the samples after the experiments [40][41][42][43] . We analyse the stress distributions in terms of the theory, established in the materials sciences [44][45][46][47] , for stress fields of a population of dislocations to test the causality between stress heterogeneity and the dislocation content (Methods). In particular, we test whether tails of the probability (P) distributions of shear stress (σ 12 ) follow a P(σ 12 ) ∝ |σ 12 | −3 relationship, as expected of stress fields generated by dislocations [44][45][46][47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angular resolution of EBSD is ~1° [8].The cross-correlation based EBSD analysis approach introduced by Wilkinson (HR-EBSD) improves the angular resolution to 0.005° by measuring small shifts of features in the EBSD patterns compared to a reference EBSD pattern [8][9][10][11]. These small shifts can be interpreted in terms of lattice rotations and lattice distortions [1,[8][9][10][11].HR-EBSD has been widely adopted to characterise geometry necessary dislocation (GND) density and residual lattice strains in crystalline materials [1,[12][13][14][15][16][17]. A comparative study…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, the theory proposed by Groma and Bakó (1998) indicates that the tail of the probability distribution of the internal stress decays with the inverse third power of the stress. This theory has been discussed and verified by Groma and Szé kely (2000), Wilkinson et al (2014) and Kalá cska et al (2017). In the constitutive modeling framework of Wang et al (2016Wang et al ( , 2017, the internal stress distribution is assumed to be Gaussian.…”
Section: Dislocation Driven Creepmentioning
confidence: 95%