1996
DOI: 10.1080/095119296131670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the bionic, fractal and holonic manufacturing system concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the pressure of the above challenges, the transformations of manufacturing systems and organizations are already underway [29]. The need for novel organizational principles, structures and method has called forth various approaches [30] in the past decade, such as holonic [31] [32], fractal [33], random [34], biological [35], and multi-agent manufacturing systems [36], to name but those investigated by CIRP colleagues. All the above approaches are similar in that they assume network-like, dynamic, open and reconfigurable systems where decisions are made and production is carried out by more or less independent and cooperative partners.…”
Section: Paradigm Shifts In Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the pressure of the above challenges, the transformations of manufacturing systems and organizations are already underway [29]. The need for novel organizational principles, structures and method has called forth various approaches [30] in the past decade, such as holonic [31] [32], fractal [33], random [34], biological [35], and multi-agent manufacturing systems [36], to name but those investigated by CIRP colleagues. All the above approaches are similar in that they assume network-like, dynamic, open and reconfigurable systems where decisions are made and production is carried out by more or less independent and cooperative partners.…”
Section: Paradigm Shifts In Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such structures, each layer in the hierarchy supports and is supported by the adjacent layers. The components, including the part, communicate and inform each other of the decisions, Tharumarajah et al (1996) and Ueda et al (1997).…”
Section: From Simple To Complex Operation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second feature is dynamics where the fractals can adapt to influences from the environment without a formal organization structure. The third feature is self-similarity understood as similarity of goals among the fractals to conform the objectives in each unit Tharumarajah et al (1996) . • Holonic Manufacturing System (HMS): The core of HMS is derived from the principles behind the term 'holon'.…”
Section: From Simple To Complex Operation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Holonic, MetaMorph and RCS approaches the system has a set of fixed predefined goals. In the Fractal approach the agents negotiate their goals (Tharumarajah et al, 1996). Bionic architectures (Okino, 1993) do not set long-term goals but seek essentially adaptation to the environment.…”
Section: Intelligent Agent Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other approaches regard schedulers, planners, controllers and resources as agents, but exclude parts. It should be noted that the concept of Intelligent Agents was built around the ObjectOriented Programming (OOP) paradigm (Tharumarajah et al, 1996). The underlying principle of OOP is the encapsulation of attributes and methods into code units called classes.…”
Section: Intelligent Agent Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%