1984
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/17/19/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the 1/N expansion and Bethe ansatz results for the degenerate Anderson model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such differences can occur in calculations where the high energy excitations, or high cut-offs, are treated differently. This situation occurs for the N -fold degenerate models (U = ∞) where the imposition of the high energy cut-off D ′ in the Bethe ansatz calculations for the linear dispersion model differs from the band width D for the conventional model, but a relation between these cut-offs can be found such that the results from the Bethe ansatz calculations can be translated into those for the conventional model [15]. A similar situation applies here.…”
Section: Results For Symmetric Modelmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such differences can occur in calculations where the high energy excitations, or high cut-offs, are treated differently. This situation occurs for the N -fold degenerate models (U = ∞) where the imposition of the high energy cut-off D ′ in the Bethe ansatz calculations for the linear dispersion model differs from the band width D for the conventional model, but a relation between these cut-offs can be found such that the results from the Bethe ansatz calculations can be translated into those for the conventional model [15]. A similar situation applies here.…”
Section: Results For Symmetric Modelmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Once the renormalized parametersǫ d andṼ have been determined the free quasiparticle Hamiltonian can be diagonalized and written in the form (15) where p † k,σ , p k,σ , and h † k,σ , h k,σ , are the creation and annihilation operators for the quasiparticle and quasihole excitations, and Λ −(N −1)/2 E p,k (N ) and Λ −(N −1)/2 E h,k (N ) are the corresponding excitation energies relative to the ground or vacuum state |0 ; the scale factor Λ −(N −1)/2 is due to the fact that the energies are calculated for the rescaled Hamiltonian, which is such that E p,k (N ) and E h,k (N ) for k = 1 are of order 1. For the lowest-lying level particle and hole levels, we have E p (N ) = E p,1 (N ) and E h (N ) = E h,1 (N ).…”
Section: Calculation Of Renormalized Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, the influence of the background is strikingly illustrated by solving for the Kondo temperature only to the first order in 1/N f . 19 This causes indeed a substantial decrease, bringing the result close to the exact value. The correct doping dependence displays the upward curvature, as also seen in our approximations CFM1 and CFM2.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…: lowering of Z and upward curvature at the approach of zero doping (1 − n → 0), is close to that of the exact Kondo scale in the Bethe ansatz solution for the Anderson impurity. 19 …”
Section: Improving the Dynamical Weight Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation