2017
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(17)32145-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of testosterone measurement by the new ‘gold standard’ method liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry versus the traditionally in clinical routine used immunoassays in the prediction of symptoms of male hypogonadism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…or in species for which no specific antibodies are available (such as sheep). Recent studies that compared the predictive values of TS levels measured by LC-MS/MS and immunoassay showed no significant difference between the two analytical methods ( Czeloth et al . 2017 , Mitchell 2012 ).…”
Section: Testosterone Levels In Clinical Preeclampsiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or in species for which no specific antibodies are available (such as sheep). Recent studies that compared the predictive values of TS levels measured by LC-MS/MS and immunoassay showed no significant difference between the two analytical methods ( Czeloth et al . 2017 , Mitchell 2012 ).…”
Section: Testosterone Levels In Clinical Preeclampsiamentioning
confidence: 99%