2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of statistical tests for habitat associations in tropical forests: A case study of sympatric dipterocarp trees in a Bornean forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an index of habitat niche breadth, we used the standard deviation (SD) of habitat functions of the study species, P(E|x), along the elevation gradient reported by Itoh et al (2010). A positive correlation was expected between mean clump size and inverse wing-loading or habitat niche breadth if seed dispersal or habitat niche breadth, respectively, was important.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an index of habitat niche breadth, we used the standard deviation (SD) of habitat functions of the study species, P(E|x), along the elevation gradient reported by Itoh et al (2010). A positive correlation was expected between mean clump size and inverse wing-loading or habitat niche breadth if seed dispersal or habitat niche breadth, respectively, was important.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an index of habitat niche breadth, we used the standard deviation (SD) of habitat functions of the study species, P(E|x), along the elevation gradient reported by Itoh et al (2010). All the study species except S. parvifolia had statistically smaller SD values, indicating that they were all habitat specialists along elevation in the study plot (Itoh et al 2010). Higher elevation sites were mostly on sandy ridges having lower soil nutrients, while lower elevation sites in clay-rich valleys with higher soil nutrients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the soil conditions were categorised in most cases on the basis of apparent topography or soil classification types (Gunatilleke et al 2006;Comita et al 2007;Chuyong et al 2011;de Toledo et al 2011;Metz 2012); however, soil conditions vary continuously rather than discretely in a spatial context (Baldeck et al 2013). Thus, simplifying soil conditions by categorisation would reduce information related to soil environmental variation, and this may lower the robustness of any statistical analysis (Itoh et al 2010). Second, analyses of tree distributions have often used inventory data from the wellestablished stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of tree species at Lambir are habitat specialists with regard to topography and soil (Itoh et al 2003(Itoh et al , 2010Davies et al 2005;Russo et al 2005), but individuals nevertheless occur outside their habitats. The majority of tree species at Lambir are habitat specialists with regard to topography and soil (Itoh et al 2003(Itoh et al , 2010Davies et al 2005;Russo et al 2005), but individuals nevertheless occur outside their habitats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%