2007
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4906-06.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Recordings from Microelectrode Arrays and Single Electrodes in the Visual Cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
140
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, if ictogenesis is a rather spatially local mechanism in the seizure onset zone, electrode contacts need to be abundant enough to cover a large volume (covering the seizure onset zone) and able to record from small enough volume in order to pick up any preictal change. Such electrode contacts do exist in the form of micro-contacts (Kelly et al, 2007;Stead et al, 2010) and studies on seizure prediction analysing data recorded with these electrodes are expected to provide answers to important questions on seizure predictability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, if ictogenesis is a rather spatially local mechanism in the seizure onset zone, electrode contacts need to be abundant enough to cover a large volume (covering the seizure onset zone) and able to record from small enough volume in order to pick up any preictal change. Such electrode contacts do exist in the form of micro-contacts (Kelly et al, 2007;Stead et al, 2010) and studies on seizure prediction analysing data recorded with these electrodes are expected to provide answers to important questions on seizure predictability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data analysis was carried out in MATLAB (Mathworks). Spikes were sorted offline (56)(57)(58)(59). All recorded single units (n = 823) were classified as putative interneurons (pINs) or putative principal cells (pPCs) based on action potential width ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that variation in electrode impedance across sessions is not likely to meaningfully affect our results, as intracranial signals (Nelson and Pouget 2010) and scalp EEG (Kappenman and Luck 2010) have been shown to be impacted negligibly by electrode impedance if the input impedance to the amplifier is much greater, as it was in our case. These waveform segments were sorted with an automated clustering algorithm (Shoham et al 2003) followed by manual refinement with custom MATLAB software (Kelly et al 2007; available at http://www.smithlab.net/spikesort.html), taking into account the waveform shapes and interspike interval distributions. After sorting, we calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of each candidate unit as the ratio of the average waveform amplitude to the standard deviation of the waveform noise (Kelly et al 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These waveform segments were sorted with an automated clustering algorithm (Shoham et al 2003) followed by manual refinement with custom MATLAB software (Kelly et al 2007; available at http://www.smithlab.net/spikesort.html), taking into account the waveform shapes and interspike interval distributions. After sorting, we calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of each candidate unit as the ratio of the average waveform amplitude to the standard deviation of the waveform noise (Kelly et al 2007). Candidates with an SNR below 2.5 were discarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%