2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-015-0618-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of quenched and annealed invariance principles for random conductance model

Abstract: We show that there exists an ergodic conductance environment such that the weak (annealed) invariance principle holds for the corresponding continuous time random walk but the quenched invariance principle does not hold.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that in view of the counterexample in [11] a moment condition is necessary already for the (non-quantitative) invariance principle to hold.…”
Section: Assumption 13 (Spectral Gap)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that in view of the counterexample in [11] a moment condition is necessary already for the (non-quantitative) invariance principle to hold.…”
Section: Assumption 13 (Spectral Gap)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of a general ergodic environment, due to a trapping phenomenon, it is clear that some moment conditions (stronger than the one in (1.3)) are needed. Indeed, Barlow, Burdzy and Timar [11] give an example on Z 2 which satisfies a weak moment condition, but not a quenched invariance principle. To formulate the moment condition used in our paper, we set for any p, q ∈ [1, ∞],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove Theorem 1 note that by Lemmas 6 and 7 it suffices to find C, γ, δ > 0 such that (2) P 0 (T > n) ≤ Ce −γn δ , for every n.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any 2-valued model µ(γ (1) ) = p = 1 − µ(γ (2) ) ∈ (0, 1), let N (i) n = #{0 ≤ m < n : ω Xm = γ (i) } and note that N (1) n + N (2) n = n. Let us write N n for N (1) n .…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation