Comparison of primary and secondary closure techniques after removal of impacted mandibular third molars

Primary Closure Versus Secondary Closure after Third Molar Surgery : A Comparative Evaluation of Post – Operative Sequelae

“…Dubois et al reported that following the surgical removal of both lower molar, pain and swelling were significantly greater when the surgical wound healed by first intention. 21 These findings coincide with the findings of this study. Likewise, Holland and Hindle reported more pain and swelling in those cases where primary closure was carried out.…”

Primary Closure Versus Secondary Closure after Third Molar Surgery : A Comparative Evaluation of Post – Operative Sequelae

“…Dubois et al reported that following the surgical removal of both lower molar, pain and swelling were significantly greater when the surgical wound healed by first intention. 21 These findings coincide with the findings of this study. Likewise, Holland and Hindle reported more pain and swelling in those cases where primary closure was carried out.…”

How effective is collagen resorbable membrane placement after partially impacted mandibular third molar surgery on postoperative morbidity? A prospective randomized comparative study

“…In the present study, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of dry socket between the groups. This finding is consistent with the findings of other studies [ 1 , 2 , 18 ]. Similarly, Danda et al [ 24 ] compared the influence of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound on alveolitis after removal of impacted mandibular 3Ms and recorded no difference between these 2 groups.…”

Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study

“…Results of the current study showed that group 2 had reduced pain and swelling when calculated from day 1 to day 7 as compared to group 1, which is in agreement with the studies done by Dubois et al [17] and Holland and Hindle [18] who postulated that secondary closure reduced pain and swelling in the immediate postoperative period and also reduced the discomfort of the patient.…”

Primary Closure Versus Secondary Closure after Third Molar Surgery : A Comparative Evaluation of Post – Operative Sequelae

“…Dubois et al reported that following the surgical removal of both lower molar, pain and swelling were significantly greater when the surgical wound healed by first intention. 21 These findings coincide with the findings of this study. Likewise, Holland and Hindle reported more pain and swelling in those cases where primary closure was carried out.…”

How effective is collagen resorbable membrane placement after partially impacted mandibular third molar surgery on postoperative morbidity? A prospective randomized comparative study

“…In the present study, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of dry socket between the groups. This finding is consistent with the findings of other studies [ 1 , 2 , 18 ]. Similarly, Danda et al [ 24 ] compared the influence of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound on alveolitis after removal of impacted mandibular 3Ms and recorded no difference between these 2 groups.…”

Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study

“…Results of the current study showed that group 2 had reduced pain and swelling when calculated from day 1 to day 7 as compared to group 1, which is in agreement with the studies done by Dubois et al [17] and Holland and Hindle [18] who postulated that secondary closure reduced pain and swelling in the immediate postoperative period and also reduced the discomfort of the patient.…”

Primary Closure Versus Secondary Closure after Third Molar Surgery : A Comparative Evaluation of Post – Operative Sequelae

“…Dubois et al reported that following the surgical removal of both lower molar, pain and swelling were significantly greater when the surgical wound healed by first intention. 21 These findings coincide with the findings of this study. Likewise, Holland and Hindle reported more pain and swelling in those cases where primary closure was carried out.…”

How effective is collagen resorbable membrane placement after partially impacted mandibular third molar surgery on postoperative morbidity? A prospective randomized comparative study

“…In the present study, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of dry socket between the groups. This finding is consistent with the findings of other studies [ 1 , 2 , 18 ]. Similarly, Danda et al [ 24 ] compared the influence of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound on alveolitis after removal of impacted mandibular 3Ms and recorded no difference between these 2 groups.…”

Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study

“…Results of the current study showed that group 2 had reduced pain and swelling when calculated from day 1 to day 7 as compared to group 1, which is in agreement with the studies done by Dubois et al [17] and Holland and Hindle [18] who postulated that secondary closure reduced pain and swelling in the immediate postoperative period and also reduced the discomfort of the patient.…”