2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of porcine and human adipose tissue loading responses under dynamic compression and shear: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on adipose tissue, Sun et al (2021c) used dynamic compression and simple shear loading tests to compare human abdominal and porcine adipose tissues. The tissue was found to be non-linear and could be modeled as a one-term Ogden hyperelastic material.…”
Section: Breast Tissue: Basic Concepts and Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on adipose tissue, Sun et al (2021c) used dynamic compression and simple shear loading tests to compare human abdominal and porcine adipose tissues. The tissue was found to be non-linear and could be modeled as a one-term Ogden hyperelastic material.…”
Section: Breast Tissue: Basic Concepts and Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compression to high strains (some up to ∼ 60%) led to reversible deformation within the elastic region even with nonlinearity of the σ-ε curves (visco- and hyperelasticity of most biological materials [40, 46, 47]). Ad had drastically lower σ and its derivative (dσ/dε) compared to both Fb’s (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a value of about 2.5 kPa, Sommer et al found the Cauchy stress of human abdominal adipose tissue at a tensile stretch of 15% to be about 25 times higher than the Cauchy stress of 0.1 kPa observed by Comley and Fleck for porcine subcutaneous adipose tissue at the same tensile stretch [ 27 , 40 ]. Sun et al, in contrast, tested human abdominal and porcine dorsal adipose tissue under uniaxial compression and simple shear at a strain rate of 3 s −1 and found that the porcine tissue behaved stiffer for both loading scenarios [ 31 ]. Nevertheless, the microstructure of human and porcine subcutaneous tissue is quite similar and, as material behaviour is supposed to be strongly linked to the microstructure of the tissue, porcine subcutaneous adipose tissue seems to be an acceptable model for human tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material behaviour of adipose tissue has been investigated in several studies under different loading conditions. Compressive behaviour was analysed using setups for uniaxial confined or unconfined compression or indentation testing for porcine and ovine subcutaneous adipose tissue, human abdominal tissue, human breast tissue, the human calcaneal fat pad and human plantar soft tissue [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Results show that adipose tissue behaves non-linear, exhibiting a J-shaped stress-strain response, typical for hyperelastic materials [27,33,36,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation