2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822008000300003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of plant growth-promotion with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis in three vegetables

Abstract: Our objective was to compare some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) properties of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as representatives of their two genera. Solanum lycopersicum L. (tomato), Abelmoschus esculentus (okra), and Amaranthus sp. (African spinach) were inoculated with the bacterial cultures. At 60 days after planting, dry biomass for plants treated with B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa increased 31% for tomato, 36% and 29% for okra, and 83% and 40% for African spinach respectively o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
54
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The result was in agreement with Adesemoye et al (2008) who found that Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacillus subtilis were able to increase the biomass of tomato. In addition, Yadavet al (2003) studied the efficiency of Azotobacter biofertilizers and they found that Azotobacter inoculations increased potato tuber yield from 5-14%.…”
Section: Effect Biofertilizer On Plant Productionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The result was in agreement with Adesemoye et al (2008) who found that Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacillus subtilis were able to increase the biomass of tomato. In addition, Yadavet al (2003) studied the efficiency of Azotobacter biofertilizers and they found that Azotobacter inoculations increased potato tuber yield from 5-14%.…”
Section: Effect Biofertilizer On Plant Productionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The Pseudomonas isolates due to their great plant growth promoting abilities facilitated the growth of each plant. In a follow up study, Adesemoye et al (2008) evaluated the comparative properties of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. They did not find any significant difference in overall performance of B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa.…”
Section: Free Living Pgprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, some species of the dominant bacteria genera (Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Burkholderia and Stenotrophomonas) identified from the spermosphere of reciprocal cross maize through genetic techniques have previously been identified as common PGPR (Lucy et al 2004;Berge et al 2002;Elo et al 2001;Hong et al 2009;de Silva et al 2000;Adesemoye et al 2008;Compant et al 2005;Nowak and Shulaev 2003;Pillay and Nowak 1997). When the radicles break out and the seed coats are exposed, these bacteria Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Dominant Spermosphere Indigenous Bacteria Of 1mentioning
confidence: 72%