1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(1998)12:5<257::aid-jcla1>3.3.co;2-3
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Comparison of PCR, (1→3)‐β‐d‐glucan and galactomannan assays in sera of rats with experimental invasive aspergillosis

Abstract: We compared PCR, galactomannan detection assay using a latex agglutination test and (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan detection assay in detecting infection in rats experimentally infected with Aspergillus fumigatus. On day 2 after inoculation, (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan and nested PCR were positive for 80%, while galactomannan detection assay was positive for 60%. In addition, the positive result of nested PCR (87.5%) was higher than those of galactomannan detection assay (75%) and (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan (71.4%) on day 3 after… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
8
3
2
0

Citation Types

0
16
0
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
11

Relationship

0
11

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 11 publications

(16 citation statements)
references

References 30 publications

0
16
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Similarly, false negatives of b-glucan levels in histologically proven infection have been reported in studies using rat models of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and b-glucan levels in the serum appear to rise later during infection than do galactomannan levels [49,50]. The question of appropriate cutoff value to use for the b-glucan assay with animal models also is yet to be decided, which is relevant since the sensitivity of both galactomannan and b-glucan assays have been reported to be lower than for PCR [49]. One aspect that should be further investigated, and could be problematic when using galactomannan as a marker of fungal burden in preclinical drug studies is the increase of galactomannan in serum after treatment.…”
Section: Pcr and Immunoassays
mentioning
confidence: 75%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Similarly, false negatives of b-glucan levels in histologically proven infection have been reported in studies using rat models of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and b-glucan levels in the serum appear to rise later during infection than do galactomannan levels [49,50]. The question of appropriate cutoff value to use for the b-glucan assay with animal models also is yet to be decided, which is relevant since the sensitivity of both galactomannan and b-glucan assays have been reported to be lower than for PCR [49]. One aspect that should be further investigated, and could be problematic when using galactomannan as a marker of fungal burden in preclinical drug studies is the increase of galactomannan in serum after treatment.…”
Section: Pcr and Immunoassays
mentioning
confidence: 75%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this study, the sensitivity of Aspergillus DNA was 90% and the specificity in patient sera was 73.3%. It is possible to find numerous studies that compare GM, BDG, and specific DNA tests (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). In most of these studies, standard methods were used for GM and BDG, whereas different DNA search methods were used, as mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that rather than type and amount of sample or extraction method used, primary probes and PCR format are more important in terms of sensitivity. Similar to sensitivity, various PCR formats had a specificity of 40%-100% (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Nevertheless, due to decrease in contamination, highest specificity was achieved by RT-PCR.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…11 In contrast to BDG and GM results, detection of A. fumigatus DNA by nPCR in our rat model was not as sensitive as has been reported in some previous experimental studies. [16][17][18] Hashimoto et al [16] found that on day 2 after inoculation, the combined sensitivity of BDG and nPCR was 80%, while GM alone was positive in only 60% of rats. In contrast, on day 3 after inoculation, nPCR showed a sensitivity of 88%, whereas GM and BDG had a sensitivity of 75% and 71% respectively.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%