2016
DOI: 10.1111/joic.12296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Outcomes after Device Closure with Transseptal Puncture and Standard Technique in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale and Ischemic Events

Abstract: Compared to the standard technique, PFO closure with the transseptal puncture technique showed higher incidence of residual shunt and ischemic events. Therefore, this technique might be considered in only highly selected patients as the last option.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that the application of transseptal puncture may have contributed to the large residual shunt. Transseptal puncture technique may be an effective option for facilitating device closure after the failure of conventional approach, but an increased incidence of residual shunt was observed with this technique [23]. Comparative studies between Cardi-O-fix PFO occluder and other type of occluders have been rarely conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that the application of transseptal puncture may have contributed to the large residual shunt. Transseptal puncture technique may be an effective option for facilitating device closure after the failure of conventional approach, but an increased incidence of residual shunt was observed with this technique [23]. Comparative studies between Cardi-O-fix PFO occluder and other type of occluders have been rarely conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFO closure was determined according to the heart team's discretion (the team consisted of a cardiologist, a neurologist, and a radiologist) based on clinical data, echocardiographic findings, and patients’ preference. Seventy patients (27%) with a mild grade PFO shunt and 27 patients (11%) that had previously undergone PFO closure using the transseptal puncture technique were excluded . Finally, 158 patients (men 120, overall mean age 49.9 years) were included in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFO closure was determined according to the discretion of the heart team (consisting of an interventional cardiologist, an echocardiographer-cardiologist, a neurologist, and a radiologist) based on clinical data, echocardiographic findings, and patient preference. All patients (51 men, overall mean age 50 years) had a PFO of more than moderate grade, as assessed according to previous studies [ 11 , 12 ]. The Amplatzer ® PFO Occluder (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA), GORE ® Septal Occluder (WL Gore and Associates Inc., Newark, DE, USA), and Occlutech Figulla ® PFO Occluder (Occlutech GmbH, Jena, Germany) were implanted in all patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shunt was defined as the appearance of contrast bubbles in the left atrium (LA) within three cardiac cycles of opacification of the right atrium (RA). Shunt degrees were defined as mild, moderate, and severe if 3–9, 10–30, and >30 contrast bubbles, respectively, appeared in the LA [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Shunt at rest was defined as the appearance of contrast bubbles in the LA within three cardiac cycles of RA opacification with normal respiration or presence of shunt flow on color Doppler [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation